Rehabilitation Interventions for Poststroke Hand Oedema: A Systematic Review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Thuy Anh Giang , Alan Wei Guang Ong , Karthikeyan Krishnamurthy , Kenneth N.K. Fong
{"title":"Rehabilitation Interventions for Poststroke Hand Oedema: A Systematic Review","authors":"Thuy Anh Giang ,&nbsp;Alan Wei Guang Ong ,&nbsp;Karthikeyan Krishnamurthy ,&nbsp;Kenneth N.K. Fong","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>To review the evidence of rehabilitation interventions for the management of poststroke hand oedema.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review of research articles in electronic databases published in English between 1999 and 2015. Two investigators working independently retrieved articles from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Taylor &amp; Francis Online, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, Springer (MetaPress), ScienceDirect, PubMed, SAGE Journals Online, EBSCO, and Web of Science. Only controlled trials with outcome measures and interventions for poststroke hand oedema were included. Three investigators critically appraised the selected studies using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 189 articles identified, nine (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 nonrandomized controlled trials, and 1 crossover controlled trial) were selected. These studies are heterogeneous in terms of design and types of intervention for poststroke hand oedema. The interventions reducing hand oedema are Lycra pressure garments with glove splints, bilateral passive motion upper-limb exercises, laser therapy, and acupressure. However, due to these studies' short intervention periods and the fact that hand oedema is not their primary outcome measure, it is not possible to draw a firm conclusion on their clinical significance for managing poststroke hand oedema.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Further study needs to focus solely on interventions for poststroke hand oedema and their long-term effects. No conclusion can be made on the most effective management of poststroke hand oedema until much more evidence is available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.03.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186116300122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective/Background

To review the evidence of rehabilitation interventions for the management of poststroke hand oedema.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of research articles in electronic databases published in English between 1999 and 2015. Two investigators working independently retrieved articles from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Taylor & Francis Online, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, Springer (MetaPress), ScienceDirect, PubMed, SAGE Journals Online, EBSCO, and Web of Science. Only controlled trials with outcome measures and interventions for poststroke hand oedema were included. Three investigators critically appraised the selected studies using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale.

Results

Of the 189 articles identified, nine (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 nonrandomized controlled trials, and 1 crossover controlled trial) were selected. These studies are heterogeneous in terms of design and types of intervention for poststroke hand oedema. The interventions reducing hand oedema are Lycra pressure garments with glove splints, bilateral passive motion upper-limb exercises, laser therapy, and acupressure. However, due to these studies' short intervention periods and the fact that hand oedema is not their primary outcome measure, it is not possible to draw a firm conclusion on their clinical significance for managing poststroke hand oedema.

Conclusion

Further study needs to focus solely on interventions for poststroke hand oedema and their long-term effects. No conclusion can be made on the most effective management of poststroke hand oedema until much more evidence is available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑卒中后手水肿的康复干预:一项系统综述
目的/背景回顾康复干预治疗脑卒中后手部水肿的证据。方法对1999 - 2015年发表的英文电子数据库研究论文进行系统回顾。两位独立工作的研究者从Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Taylor &Francis Online, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, b施普林格(MetaPress), ScienceDirect, PubMed, SAGE Journals Online, EBSCO和Web of Science。仅纳入了卒中后手部水肿的结果测量和干预措施的对照试验。三位研究者使用物理治疗证据数据库量表对选定的研究进行了批判性评价。结果共纳入189篇文献,共选择9篇(5篇随机对照试验,3篇非随机对照试验,1篇交叉对照试验)。这些研究在卒中后手部水肿干预的设计和类型方面存在差异。减少手部水肿的干预措施是莱卡压力服配手套夹板,双侧被动上肢运动,激光治疗和指压。然而,由于这些研究的干预期较短,且手部水肿并非其主要结局指标,因此尚不能确定其对脑卒中后手部水肿治疗的临床意义。结论脑卒中后手水肿的干预措施及其远期效果有待进一步研究。在获得更多的证据之前,尚不能对中风后手部水肿的最有效治疗作出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信