Evaluation of Self-management Program Outcomes: Adaptation and Testing of a Swedish Version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ).

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Christine Kumlien, Michael Miller, Cecilia Fagerstrom, Peter Hagell
{"title":"Evaluation of Self-management Program Outcomes: Adaptation and Testing of a Swedish Version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ).","authors":"Christine Kumlien,&nbsp;Michael Miller,&nbsp;Cecilia Fagerstrom,&nbsp;Peter Hagell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-management programs require a range of indicators to evaluate their outcomes. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) was developed to meet this need. The heiQ contains 40 items with 4 response categories, representing eight scales. We developed a Swedish version of the heiQ that was tested by cognitive interviews (n = 15) and psychometrically (n = 177) using classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement theory (RMT). The Swedish heiQ was easily understood by interviewees and met CTT criteria, with supported scaling assumptions (corrected item-total correlations, 0.37) and reliability (ordinal alpha 0.78). General support was demonstrated for the measurement properties of the eight heiQ scales by acceptable RMT fit. However, there were signs of malfunctioning response categories for four items in two scales, and of suboptimal item coverage of the measurement continua. The Swedish heiQ appears comparable to other available language versions. Further efforts may be needed to optimize response categories and measurement precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"19 3","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-management programs require a range of indicators to evaluate their outcomes. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) was developed to meet this need. The heiQ contains 40 items with 4 response categories, representing eight scales. We developed a Swedish version of the heiQ that was tested by cognitive interviews (n = 15) and psychometrically (n = 177) using classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement theory (RMT). The Swedish heiQ was easily understood by interviewees and met CTT criteria, with supported scaling assumptions (corrected item-total correlations, 0.37) and reliability (ordinal alpha 0.78). General support was demonstrated for the measurement properties of the eight heiQ scales by acceptable RMT fit. However, there were signs of malfunctioning response categories for four items in two scales, and of suboptimal item coverage of the measurement continua. The Swedish heiQ appears comparable to other available language versions. Further efforts may be needed to optimize response categories and measurement precision.

自我管理计划结果的评估:瑞典版健康教育影响问卷(heiQ)的适应和测试。
自我管理项目需要一系列指标来评估其结果。制定健康教育影响问卷(heiQ)就是为了满足这一需求。heiQ包含40个题目,4个回答类别,代表8个量表。我们开发了一个瑞典版本的heiQ,通过认知访谈(n = 15)和心理测量学(n = 177)使用经典测试理论(CTT)和Rasch测量理论(RMT)进行测试。瑞典的heiQ很容易被受访者理解,符合CTT标准,并支持标度假设(修正的项目-总相关性,0.37)和可靠性(序数α 0.78)。通过可接受的RMT拟合,证明了八个heiQ量表的测量特性是普遍支持的。然而,在两个量表中,有四个项目的反应类别出现故障的迹象,以及测量持续的次优项目覆盖。瑞典语的heiQ似乎与其他可用的语言版本相当。可能需要进一步努力优化响应类别和测量精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信