{"title":"Assessing the role of participants in evolution of topic lifecycles on social networks.","authors":"Kuntal Dey, Saroj Kaushik, Kritika Garg, Ritvik Shrivastava","doi":"10.1186/s40649-018-0054-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topic lifecycle analysis on social networks aims to analyze and track how topics are born from user-generated content, and how they evolve. Twitter researchers have no agreed-upon definition of topics; topics on Twitter are typically derived in the form of (a) frequently used hashtags, or (b) keywords showing sudden trends of large occurrence in a short span of time (\"bursty keywords\"), or (c) concepts latent within the tweets that are grouped using variations of semantic clustering techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current paper, we jointly model the hashtags present and the semantic concepts embedded in the content, which in turn helps us identify hashtag groups that define a \"topic\"-a concept space-that are used by a large number of tweets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observe that different hashtags belonging to a given cluster are more prominent compared to the others, at different times. We further observe that the participation and influence levels of the different users play important roles in determining which hashtag would be more prominent than the others at given times. We thus observe topics to often morph from one to the other (via morphing of dominant hashtags representing the same semantic concept space), rather than becoming extinct outright, which is a novel insight about topic lifecycles. We further present novel observations about the role of users in determining the lifecycle of discussion topics on Twitter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We infer that topic lifecycles are governed by user interests, and not by user influence, which is a key observation made by our work.</p>","PeriodicalId":52145,"journal":{"name":"Computational Social Networks","volume":"5 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40649-018-0054-x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-018-0054-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Topic lifecycle analysis on social networks aims to analyze and track how topics are born from user-generated content, and how they evolve. Twitter researchers have no agreed-upon definition of topics; topics on Twitter are typically derived in the form of (a) frequently used hashtags, or (b) keywords showing sudden trends of large occurrence in a short span of time ("bursty keywords"), or (c) concepts latent within the tweets that are grouped using variations of semantic clustering techniques.
Methods: In the current paper, we jointly model the hashtags present and the semantic concepts embedded in the content, which in turn helps us identify hashtag groups that define a "topic"-a concept space-that are used by a large number of tweets.
Results: We observe that different hashtags belonging to a given cluster are more prominent compared to the others, at different times. We further observe that the participation and influence levels of the different users play important roles in determining which hashtag would be more prominent than the others at given times. We thus observe topics to often morph from one to the other (via morphing of dominant hashtags representing the same semantic concept space), rather than becoming extinct outright, which is a novel insight about topic lifecycles. We further present novel observations about the role of users in determining the lifecycle of discussion topics on Twitter.
Conclusions: We infer that topic lifecycles are governed by user interests, and not by user influence, which is a key observation made by our work.
期刊介绍:
Computational Social Networks showcases refereed papers dealing with all mathematical, computational and applied aspects of social computing. The objective of this journal is to advance and promote the theoretical foundation, mathematical aspects, and applications of social computing. Submissions are welcome which focus on common principles, algorithms and tools that govern network structures/topologies, network functionalities, security and privacy, network behaviors, information diffusions and influence, social recommendation systems which are applicable to all types of social networks and social media. Topics include (but are not limited to) the following: -Social network design and architecture -Mathematical modeling and analysis -Real-world complex networks -Information retrieval in social contexts, political analysts -Network structure analysis -Network dynamics optimization -Complex network robustness and vulnerability -Information diffusion models and analysis -Security and privacy -Searching in complex networks -Efficient algorithms -Network behaviors -Trust and reputation -Social Influence -Social Recommendation -Social media analysis -Big data analysis on online social networks This journal publishes rigorously refereed papers dealing with all mathematical, computational and applied aspects of social computing. The journal also includes reviews of appropriate books as special issues on hot topics.