Analyzing Source Sampling to Reduce Error in ECG Forward Simulations.

Computing in cardiology Pub Date : 2017-09-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-05 DOI:10.22489/CinC.2017.371-097
Jess Tate, Karli Gillette, Brett Burton, Wilson Good, Jaume Coll-Font, Dana Brooks, Rob MacLeod
{"title":"Analyzing Source Sampling to Reduce Error in ECG Forward Simulations.","authors":"Jess Tate, Karli Gillette, Brett Burton, Wilson Good, Jaume Coll-Font, Dana Brooks, Rob MacLeod","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2017.371-097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A continuing challenge in validating ECG Imaging is the persistent error in the associated forward problem observed in experimental studies. One possible cause of error is insufficient representation of the cardiac sources, which is often measured from only the ventricular epicardium, ignoring the endocardium and the atria. We hypothesize that measurements that completely cover the heart are required for accurate forward solutions. In this study, we used simulated and measured cardiac potentials to test the effect of different levels of sampling on the forward simulation. We found that omitting source samples on the atria increases the peak RMS error by a mean of 464 μν when compared the the fully sampled cardiac surface. Increasing the sampling on the atria in stages reduced the average error of the forward simulation proportionally to the number of additional samples and revealed some strategies may reduce error with fewer samples, such as adding samples to the AV plane and the atrial roof. Based on these results, we can design a sampling strategy to use in future validation studies.","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"44 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103632/pdf/nihms934987.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2017.371-097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A continuing challenge in validating ECG Imaging is the persistent error in the associated forward problem observed in experimental studies. One possible cause of error is insufficient representation of the cardiac sources, which is often measured from only the ventricular epicardium, ignoring the endocardium and the atria. We hypothesize that measurements that completely cover the heart are required for accurate forward solutions. In this study, we used simulated and measured cardiac potentials to test the effect of different levels of sampling on the forward simulation. We found that omitting source samples on the atria increases the peak RMS error by a mean of 464 μν when compared the the fully sampled cardiac surface. Increasing the sampling on the atria in stages reduced the average error of the forward simulation proportionally to the number of additional samples and revealed some strategies may reduce error with fewer samples, such as adding samples to the AV plane and the atrial roof. Based on these results, we can design a sampling strategy to use in future validation studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分析源采样减少心电正演模拟误差。
验证心电图成像的一个持续的挑战是在实验研究中观察到的相关前向问题的持续误差。误差的一个可能原因是对心源的描述不够充分,通常只从心室心外膜测量,而忽略了心内膜和心房。我们假设需要完全覆盖心脏的测量来获得准确的正向解决方案。在本研究中,我们使用模拟和测量的心脏电位来测试不同采样水平对正向模拟的影响。我们发现,与完全采样的心脏表面相比,在心房上省略源样本使峰值均方根误差平均增加464 μV。分阶段增加心房采样使前向模拟的平均误差与增加的样本数量成比例地减小,并揭示了一些在较少样本情况下减小误差的策略,如在房室平面和心房顶增加样本。基于这些结果,我们可以设计一个采样策略用于未来的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信