Factors that Affect the Osteoclastogenesis of RAW264.7 Cells.

John Nguyen, Anja Nohe
{"title":"Factors that Affect the Osteoclastogenesis of RAW264.7 Cells.","authors":"John Nguyen,&nbsp;Anja Nohe","doi":"10.16966/2576-5833.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoclasts and their activity are key regulators of bone formation. However, studying osteoclasts is difficult. Primary osteoclast cultures are difficult to maintain and isolate. Also, the amount of cells that are isolated and their properties depend on the origin and differentiation protocols. These protocols are usually developed in a distinct lab and multiple protocols exist. A cell line to study osteoclasts and a thorough study of osteoclast differentiation and culturing is currently lacking. The RAW264.7 cell line is most commonly used to study osteoclast differentiation and its signaling pathways. RAW264.7 cells are not a homogenous cell line. They don't often exclusively differentiate into osteoclast but also into other multinucleated cells as well including macrophage polykaryons. A challenge of culturing RAW264.7 cells are culture conditions. Different conditions can affect survival, proliferation, and differentiation of RAW264.7 cells. Currently published protocols of culturing RAW264.7 cells often assume multinucleated cells that have three or more nuclei with distinguished osteoclast characteristics (such as TRAP+) as osteoclasts. However, osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons are almost indistinguishable under a light microscope (TRAP+ with three or more nuclei). The goal of this paper is to examine the effect of culture conditions on the osteoclastogenesis ability of RAW264.7 cells. The focus will be on establishing the crucial parameters for culture density, time of stimulation, RANKL, and L-Gln concentrations. Although we are unable to establish the condition that offers a homogenous population of osteoclasts; nevertheless, we are able to identify the optimal conditions at which osteoclasts are found to be more than macrophage polykaryons. Finally, this article also demonstrates that osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons can be distinguished by immunofluorescence staining for cathepsin K.</p>","PeriodicalId":92393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemistry and analytical studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.16966/2576-5833.109","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemistry and analytical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2576-5833.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Osteoclasts and their activity are key regulators of bone formation. However, studying osteoclasts is difficult. Primary osteoclast cultures are difficult to maintain and isolate. Also, the amount of cells that are isolated and their properties depend on the origin and differentiation protocols. These protocols are usually developed in a distinct lab and multiple protocols exist. A cell line to study osteoclasts and a thorough study of osteoclast differentiation and culturing is currently lacking. The RAW264.7 cell line is most commonly used to study osteoclast differentiation and its signaling pathways. RAW264.7 cells are not a homogenous cell line. They don't often exclusively differentiate into osteoclast but also into other multinucleated cells as well including macrophage polykaryons. A challenge of culturing RAW264.7 cells are culture conditions. Different conditions can affect survival, proliferation, and differentiation of RAW264.7 cells. Currently published protocols of culturing RAW264.7 cells often assume multinucleated cells that have three or more nuclei with distinguished osteoclast characteristics (such as TRAP+) as osteoclasts. However, osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons are almost indistinguishable under a light microscope (TRAP+ with three or more nuclei). The goal of this paper is to examine the effect of culture conditions on the osteoclastogenesis ability of RAW264.7 cells. The focus will be on establishing the crucial parameters for culture density, time of stimulation, RANKL, and L-Gln concentrations. Although we are unable to establish the condition that offers a homogenous population of osteoclasts; nevertheless, we are able to identify the optimal conditions at which osteoclasts are found to be more than macrophage polykaryons. Finally, this article also demonstrates that osteoclasts and macrophage polykaryons can be distinguished by immunofluorescence staining for cathepsin K.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

影响RAW264.7细胞破骨细胞发生的因素。
破骨细胞及其活性是骨形成的关键调节因子。然而,研究破骨细胞是困难的。原代破骨细胞培养难以维持和分离。此外,分离的细胞数量及其性质取决于来源和分化方案。这些协议通常在不同的实验室中开发,并且存在多个协议。目前缺乏研究破骨细胞的细胞系和对破骨细胞分化和培养的深入研究。RAW264.7细胞系是研究破骨细胞分化及其信号通路最常用的细胞系。RAW264.7细胞不是同质细胞系。它们不仅能分化成破骨细胞,还能分化成其他多核细胞,包括巨噬细胞多核细胞。RAW264.7细胞培养的一个挑战是培养条件。不同的条件会影响RAW264.7细胞的存活、增殖和分化。目前发表的RAW264.7细胞培养方案通常假设具有三个或更多细胞核的多核细胞具有明显的破骨细胞特征(如TRAP+)作为破骨细胞。然而,在光镜下,破骨细胞和巨噬细胞多核几乎无法区分(TRAP+具有三个或更多核)。本文的目的是研究培养条件对RAW264.7细胞破骨生成能力的影响。重点是建立培养密度、刺激时间、RANKL和L-Gln浓度的关键参数。虽然我们无法建立提供同质种群破骨细胞的条件;尽管如此,我们能够确定破骨细胞比巨噬细胞多核细胞多的最佳条件。最后,本文还证明了通过组织蛋白酶K的免疫荧光染色可以区分破骨细胞和巨噬细胞多核细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信