Philippine Lucas, Serge Boulinguez, Vincent Sibaud, Loïc Mourey, Laurence Lamant, Carle Paul, Nicolas Meyer
{"title":"Characterization and Outcomes of Disease Progression in 52 Patients Treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK Inhibitors for Advanced Melanoma.","authors":"Philippine Lucas, Serge Boulinguez, Vincent Sibaud, Loïc Mourey, Laurence Lamant, Carle Paul, Nicolas Meyer","doi":"10.1159/000490891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined treatment with BRAF-V600 and MEK inhibitors has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Pattern of disease progression and outcomes in patients have not been fully characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of a cohort of 52 patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors for advanced melanoma over a 12-month period. The aim of this study was to characterize disease progression, defined as metastatic pattern, disease kinetics, and response to subsequent therapies, in melanoma patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease progression was observed in 31/52 (59.6%) patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors. Relapse of melanoma involved the CNS for 22/31 (70.9%) patients with disease progression, including 18/31 (58%) patients who had exclusive intracranial metastases. Sixteen patients died from disease progression. Among the 31 patients who had disease progression, the median time until a relapse was 8 months, and the median survival time after disease progression was 2 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that, for patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors who lose response, disease progression was aggressive and had poor outcomes. Most patients had CNS metastases and low rates of therapeutic response to any subsequent therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490891","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Background: Combined treatment with BRAF-V600 and MEK inhibitors has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Pattern of disease progression and outcomes in patients have not been fully characterized.
Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of a cohort of 52 patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors for advanced melanoma over a 12-month period. The aim of this study was to characterize disease progression, defined as metastatic pattern, disease kinetics, and response to subsequent therapies, in melanoma patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors.
Results: Disease progression was observed in 31/52 (59.6%) patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors. Relapse of melanoma involved the CNS for 22/31 (70.9%) patients with disease progression, including 18/31 (58%) patients who had exclusive intracranial metastases. Sixteen patients died from disease progression. Among the 31 patients who had disease progression, the median time until a relapse was 8 months, and the median survival time after disease progression was 2 months.
Conclusion: Our study shows that, for patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors who lose response, disease progression was aggressive and had poor outcomes. Most patients had CNS metastases and low rates of therapeutic response to any subsequent therapy.