Role of the Mechanisms of Detection in the Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an HMO in Buenos Aires.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2018-07-15 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8986074
María Fabiana Russo Picasso, Jimena Vicens, Carina Giuliani, Ana Del Valle Jaén, Carmen Cabezón, Marcelo Figari, Ana María Gómez Saldaño, Silvana Figar
{"title":"Role of the Mechanisms of Detection in the Increased Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an HMO in Buenos Aires.","authors":"María Fabiana Russo Picasso,&nbsp;Jimena Vicens,&nbsp;Carina Giuliani,&nbsp;Ana Del Valle Jaén,&nbsp;Carmen Cabezón,&nbsp;Marcelo Figari,&nbsp;Ana María Gómez Saldaño,&nbsp;Silvana Figar","doi":"10.1155/2018/8986074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two hypotheses attempt to explain the increase of thyroid cancer (TC) incidence: overdetection by excessive diagnostic scrutiny and a true increase in new cases brought about by environmental factors. Changes in the mechanism of detection and the risk of incidentally diagnosed TC could result in an increase of TC incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. We identified incident cases of TC from the pathological reports of patients in a HMO and review of clinical records. The results were analyzed in two periods: 2003-2007 and 2008-2012. Incidence rates expressed per 100,000 person-years (with 95% CI) and relative risk of incidence rates of incidental and nonincidental TC were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative risk of incidentally detecting a thyroid cancer in 2008-2012 compared to 2003-2007 was 6.06 (95%CI 1.84-20.04). Clinical evaluations detected 31 (75.6%) cancers in the period 2003-2007 and 70 (51.8%) cancers in the period 2008-2012 (p<0.007). Although tumor median size was significantly lower in the period 2008-2012 (10 vs. 14 mm, p<0.03), tumors greater than 40 mm (4.3%) were only present in 2008-2012. The female/male ratio decreased between analyzed periods from 8 (3-21) to 4 (3-7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings partially support the hypothesis of increased incidence due to overdetection but do not explain the changes in the increase of larger tumors and decrease in the female/male ratio, which could be secondary to the influence of unidentified environmental factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8986074","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8986074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Two hypotheses attempt to explain the increase of thyroid cancer (TC) incidence: overdetection by excessive diagnostic scrutiny and a true increase in new cases brought about by environmental factors. Changes in the mechanism of detection and the risk of incidentally diagnosed TC could result in an increase of TC incidence.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. We identified incident cases of TC from the pathological reports of patients in a HMO and review of clinical records. The results were analyzed in two periods: 2003-2007 and 2008-2012. Incidence rates expressed per 100,000 person-years (with 95% CI) and relative risk of incidence rates of incidental and nonincidental TC were estimated.

Results: The relative risk of incidentally detecting a thyroid cancer in 2008-2012 compared to 2003-2007 was 6.06 (95%CI 1.84-20.04). Clinical evaluations detected 31 (75.6%) cancers in the period 2003-2007 and 70 (51.8%) cancers in the period 2008-2012 (p<0.007). Although tumor median size was significantly lower in the period 2008-2012 (10 vs. 14 mm, p<0.03), tumors greater than 40 mm (4.3%) were only present in 2008-2012. The female/male ratio decreased between analyzed periods from 8 (3-21) to 4 (3-7).

Conclusions: Our findings partially support the hypothesis of increased incidence due to overdetection but do not explain the changes in the increase of larger tumors and decrease in the female/male ratio, which could be secondary to the influence of unidentified environmental factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

检测机制在甲状腺癌风险增加中的作用:布宜诺斯艾利斯一家HMO的回顾性队列研究。
背景:两种假说试图解释甲状腺癌(TC)发病率的增加:过度的诊断检查导致的过度检测和环境因素导致的新病例的真正增加。发现机制的改变和意外诊断TC的风险可能导致TC发病率的增加。方法:回顾性队列研究。我们从HMO患者的病理报告和临床记录的回顾中确定了TC的事件病例。结果分为2003-2007年和2008-2012年两个时期进行分析。估计每100,000人年的发病率(95% CI)以及偶发和非偶发TC发病率的相对风险。结果:与2003-2007年相比,2008-2012年意外发现甲状腺癌的相对危险度为6.06 (95%CI 1.84 ~ 20.04)。临床评估在2003-2007年期间检测到31例(75.6%)癌症,在2008-2012年期间检测到70例(51.8%)癌症。结论:我们的研究结果部分支持由于过度检测导致发病率增加的假设,但不能解释较大肿瘤增加和男女比例下降的变化,这可能是继发于未知环境因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, and clinical studies in all areas of cancer epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信