Assessing the Status Quo of EHR Accessibility, Usability, and Knowledge Dissemination.

Saif Khairat, George Cameron Coleman, Samantha Russomagno, David Gotz
{"title":"Assessing the Status Quo of EHR Accessibility, Usability, and Knowledge Dissemination.","authors":"Saif Khairat,&nbsp;George Cameron Coleman,&nbsp;Samantha Russomagno,&nbsp;David Gotz","doi":"10.5334/egems.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was performed to better characterize accessibility to electronic health records (EHRs) among informatics professionals in various roles, settings, and organizations across the United States and internationally.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The EHR landscape has evolved significantly in recent years, though challenges remain in key areas such as usability. While patient access to electronic health information has gained more attention, levels of access among informatics professionals, including those conducting usability research, have not been well described in the literature. Ironically, many informatics professionals whose aim is to improve EHR design have restrictions on EHR access or publication, which interfere with broad dissemination of findings in areas of usability research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To quantify the limitations on EHR access and publication rights, we conducted a survey of informatics professionals from a broad spectrum of roles including practicing clinicians, researchers, administrators, and members of industry. Results were analyzed and levels of EHR access were stratified by role, organizational affiliation, geographic region, EHR type, and restrictions with regard to publishing results of usability testing, including screenshots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>126 respondents completed the survey, representing all major geographic regions in the United States. 71.5 percent of participants reported some level of EHR access, while 13 percent reported no access whatsoever. Rates of no-access were higher among faculty members and researchers (19 percent). Among faculty members and researchers, 72 percent could access the EHR for usability and/or research purposes, but, of those, fewer than 1 in 3 could freely publish screenshots with results of usability testing and half could not publish such data at all. Across users from all roles, only 21 percent reported the ability to publish screenshots freely without restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insight into current patterns of EHR accessibility among informatics professionals, highlighting restrictions that limit dissemination of usability research and testing. Further conversations and shared responsibility among the various stakeholders in industry, government, health care organizations, and informatics professionals are vital to continued EHR optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078120/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aim: This study was performed to better characterize accessibility to electronic health records (EHRs) among informatics professionals in various roles, settings, and organizations across the United States and internationally.

Background: The EHR landscape has evolved significantly in recent years, though challenges remain in key areas such as usability. While patient access to electronic health information has gained more attention, levels of access among informatics professionals, including those conducting usability research, have not been well described in the literature. Ironically, many informatics professionals whose aim is to improve EHR design have restrictions on EHR access or publication, which interfere with broad dissemination of findings in areas of usability research.

Methods: To quantify the limitations on EHR access and publication rights, we conducted a survey of informatics professionals from a broad spectrum of roles including practicing clinicians, researchers, administrators, and members of industry. Results were analyzed and levels of EHR access were stratified by role, organizational affiliation, geographic region, EHR type, and restrictions with regard to publishing results of usability testing, including screenshots.

Results: 126 respondents completed the survey, representing all major geographic regions in the United States. 71.5 percent of participants reported some level of EHR access, while 13 percent reported no access whatsoever. Rates of no-access were higher among faculty members and researchers (19 percent). Among faculty members and researchers, 72 percent could access the EHR for usability and/or research purposes, but, of those, fewer than 1 in 3 could freely publish screenshots with results of usability testing and half could not publish such data at all. Across users from all roles, only 21 percent reported the ability to publish screenshots freely without restrictions.

Conclusions: This study offers insight into current patterns of EHR accessibility among informatics professionals, highlighting restrictions that limit dissemination of usability research and testing. Further conversations and shared responsibility among the various stakeholders in industry, government, health care organizations, and informatics professionals are vital to continued EHR optimization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

电子病历可及性、可用性和知识传播现状评估。
目的:本研究旨在更好地描述美国和国际上不同角色、环境和组织的信息学专业人员对电子健康记录(EHRs)的可及性。背景:尽管在可用性等关键领域仍然存在挑战,但近年来电子病历领域已经发生了重大变化。虽然患者对电子健康信息的获取获得了更多的关注,但信息学专业人员(包括进行可用性研究的专业人员)的获取水平并没有在文献中得到很好的描述。具有讽刺意味的是,许多以改进电子病历设计为目标的信息学专业人员对电子病历的访问或出版有限制,这妨碍了可用性研究领域的研究结果的广泛传播。方法:为了量化EHR访问和出版权的限制,我们对信息学专业人员进行了一项调查,这些专业人员来自不同的角色,包括执业临床医生、研究人员、管理人员和行业成员。对结果进行分析,并根据角色、组织隶属关系、地理区域、EHR类型和发布可用性测试结果(包括截图)的限制对EHR访问级别进行分层。结果:126名受访者完成了调查,代表了美国所有主要的地理区域。71.5%的受访者表示有一定程度的电子病历访问,而13%的受访者表示根本没有访问。教职员工和研究人员的无访问率更高(19%)。在教职员工和研究人员中,72%的人可以出于可用性和/或研究目的访问电子病历,但是,其中,不到三分之一的人可以自由发布可用性测试结果的截图,一半的人根本不能发布这些数据。在所有角色的用户中,只有21%的人表示能够不受限制地自由发布截图。结论:本研究提供了信息学专业人员对电子病历可及性的当前模式的见解,突出了限制可用性研究和测试传播的限制。在行业、政府、医疗保健组织和信息专业人员中的各种利益相关者之间进行进一步的对话和分担责任对于持续的EHR优化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信