John Thometz, XueCheng Liu, Robert Rizza, Ian English, Sergery Tarima
{"title":"Effect of an elongation bending derotation brace on the infantile or juvenile scoliosis.","authors":"John Thometz, XueCheng Liu, Robert Rizza, Ian English, Sergery Tarima","doi":"10.1186/s13013-018-0160-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A wide variety of braces are commercially available designed for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but very few braces for infantile scoliosis (IS) or juvenile scoliosis (JS). The goals of this study were: 1) to briefly introduce an elongation bending derotation brace (EBDB) in the treatment of IS or JS; 2) to investigate changes of Cobb angles in the AP view of X-ray between in and out of the EBDB at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 3) to compare differences of Cobb angles (out of brace) in 3, 6, 9, and12 month with the baseline; 4) to investigate changes (out of brace) in JS and IS groups separately.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with IS or JS were recruited retrospectively for this study. Spinal manipulation was performed using a stockinet. This was done simultaneously with a surface topography scan. The procedure was done in the operating room for IS, or in a clinical setting for JS. The brace was edited and fabricated using CAD/CAM method. Radiographs were recorded in and out of bracing approximately every 3 months from baseline to 12 months. A linear mixed effects model was used to compare in and out of bracing, and out of brace Cobb angle change over the 12 month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 37.5% of curves are corrected and 37.5% stabilized after 12 months (Thoracic curves 48% correction, 19% stabilization; thoracolumbar curves 33% correction, 56% stabilization and lumbar curves 29% correction, 50% stabilization). The juvenile group had 25.7% correction and 42.9% stabilization, while the infantile group had 50% correction and 32.1% stabilization. There was a significant Cobb angle in-brace reduction in the thoracic (11°), thoracolumbar (12°), and lumbar (12°) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no statistically significant change in out of brace Cobb angle from baseline to month 12 (<i>p</i> > 0.05). No patients required surgery within the 12 month span.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes a new clinical protocol in the development of the EBDB. Short-term results show brace is effective in preventing IS or JS curve progression over a 12 month span.</p>","PeriodicalId":21573,"journal":{"name":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","volume":"13 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13013-018-0160-4","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-018-0160-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Background: A wide variety of braces are commercially available designed for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but very few braces for infantile scoliosis (IS) or juvenile scoliosis (JS). The goals of this study were: 1) to briefly introduce an elongation bending derotation brace (EBDB) in the treatment of IS or JS; 2) to investigate changes of Cobb angles in the AP view of X-ray between in and out of the EBDB at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 3) to compare differences of Cobb angles (out of brace) in 3, 6, 9, and12 month with the baseline; 4) to investigate changes (out of brace) in JS and IS groups separately.
Methods: Thirty-eight patients with IS or JS were recruited retrospectively for this study. Spinal manipulation was performed using a stockinet. This was done simultaneously with a surface topography scan. The procedure was done in the operating room for IS, or in a clinical setting for JS. The brace was edited and fabricated using CAD/CAM method. Radiographs were recorded in and out of bracing approximately every 3 months from baseline to 12 months. A linear mixed effects model was used to compare in and out of bracing, and out of brace Cobb angle change over the 12 month period.
Results: Overall, 37.5% of curves are corrected and 37.5% stabilized after 12 months (Thoracic curves 48% correction, 19% stabilization; thoracolumbar curves 33% correction, 56% stabilization and lumbar curves 29% correction, 50% stabilization). The juvenile group had 25.7% correction and 42.9% stabilization, while the infantile group had 50% correction and 32.1% stabilization. There was a significant Cobb angle in-brace reduction in the thoracic (11°), thoracolumbar (12°), and lumbar (12°) (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant change in out of brace Cobb angle from baseline to month 12 (p > 0.05). No patients required surgery within the 12 month span.
Conclusions: This study describes a new clinical protocol in the development of the EBDB. Short-term results show brace is effective in preventing IS or JS curve progression over a 12 month span.
背景:市面上为青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)设计的牙套种类繁多,但用于婴儿脊柱侧凸(IS)或青少年脊柱侧凸(JS)的牙套很少。本研究的目的是:1)简要介绍伸长性弯曲旋转支架(EBDB)在治疗IS或JS中的应用;2)研究0、3、6、9、12个月EBDB内外x线AP位Cobb角的变化;3)比较3、6、9、12个月的Cobb角(支架外)与基线的差异;4)分别调查JS和IS组的变化(在括号外)。方法:回顾性研究38例IS或JS患者。脊柱操作使用支架进行。这与表面形貌扫描同时进行。该过程在IS的手术室进行,或在JS的临床环境中进行。采用CAD/CAM方法对支架进行编辑和制作。从基线到12个月,大约每3个月记录一次支架内和支架外的x线片。采用线性混合效应模型比较12个月期间支架内和支架外的Cobb角变化。结果:总体而言,12个月后,37.5%的曲度矫正,37.5%的曲度稳定(胸部曲度矫正48%,稳定19%;胸腰椎弯曲33%矫正,56%稳定,腰椎弯曲29%矫正,50%稳定)。青少年组矫正率为25.7%,稳定率为42.9%,婴幼儿组矫正率为50%,稳定率为32.1%。支架内Cobb角在胸椎(11°)、胸腰椎(12°)和腰椎(12°)均显著降低(p p > 0.05)。在12个月内没有患者需要手术。结论:本研究描述了EBDB发展的一种新的临床方案。短期结果表明,在12个月的时间跨度内,支撑有效地防止了is或JS曲线的恶化。
期刊介绍:
Cessation.Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders is an open access, multidisciplinary journal that encompasses all aspects of research on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and cost-analyses of conservative and surgical management of all spinal deformities and disorders. Both clinical and basic science reports form the cornerstone of the journal in its endeavour to provide original, primary studies as well as narrative/systematic reviews and meta-analyses to the academic community and beyond. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders aims to provide an integrated and balanced view of cutting-edge spine research to further enhance effective collaboration among clinical spine specialists and scientists, and to ultimately improve patient outcomes based on an evidence-based spine care approach.