Comparative Study of Seven-year Outcomes Following Laser In Situ Keratomileusis with those of Trans-epithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2016-07-01
Yo Nakamura, Osamu Hieda, Kiyoshi Yamamura, Koichi Wakimasu, Isao Yokota, Shigeru Kinoshita
{"title":"Comparative Study of Seven-year Outcomes Following Laser In Situ Keratomileusis with those of Trans-epithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy.","authors":"Yo Nakamura,&nbsp;Osamu Hieda,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Yamamura,&nbsp;Koichi Wakimasu,&nbsp;Isao Yokota,&nbsp;Shigeru Kinoshita","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and trans-epithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK).\nMethods: In this retrospective study, 23 eyes of LASIK patients were compared with 23 eyes of patients who underwent tPRK; none of who underwent retreatment. The cases were matched for refractive power and patient age. In all patients, visual acuity (VA), refractive power and corneal topography were evaluated between 6-months and 7-years postoperative.\nResults: At 7-years postoperative, uncorrected VA was 20/20 or better in 71.9% of the LASIK-treated eyes and in 68.7% of the tPRK-treated eyes. From 6-months to 7-years postoperative, both the LASIK- and tPRK-treated eyes developed a slight myopia (-0.18 D and -0.36 D, p=0.24), and a difference in corneal power change was observed between the LASIK (0.23 D steeper) and tPRK (0.57 D steeper) (p=0.05) eyes.\nConclusion: At 7-years postoperative, a good surgical outcome was found in both the LASIK- and tPRK-treated eyes, yet myopic regression was more pronounced in the tPRK-treated eyes than in the LASIK-treated eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19670,"journal":{"name":"Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"120 7","pages":"487-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and trans-epithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK). Methods: In this retrospective study, 23 eyes of LASIK patients were compared with 23 eyes of patients who underwent tPRK; none of who underwent retreatment. The cases were matched for refractive power and patient age. In all patients, visual acuity (VA), refractive power and corneal topography were evaluated between 6-months and 7-years postoperative. Results: At 7-years postoperative, uncorrected VA was 20/20 or better in 71.9% of the LASIK-treated eyes and in 68.7% of the tPRK-treated eyes. From 6-months to 7-years postoperative, both the LASIK- and tPRK-treated eyes developed a slight myopia (-0.18 D and -0.36 D, p=0.24), and a difference in corneal power change was observed between the LASIK (0.23 D steeper) and tPRK (0.57 D steeper) (p=0.05) eyes. Conclusion: At 7-years postoperative, a good surgical outcome was found in both the LASIK- and tPRK-treated eyes, yet myopic regression was more pronounced in the tPRK-treated eyes than in the LASIK-treated eyes.

激光原位角膜磨砂术与经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术7年疗效的比较研究。
目的:比较激光辅助原位角膜磨除术(LASIK)和经上皮性光屈光性角膜切除术(tPRK)的远期疗效。方法:将23只LASIK患者与23只tPRK患者进行回顾性比较;没有人接受过再治疗。这些病例的屈光度和患者年龄相匹配。所有患者术后6个月至7年评估视力(VA)、屈光力和角膜地形图。结果:术后7年,71.9%的lasik治疗眼和68.7%的tprk治疗眼的未矫正内视差为20/20或更好。术后6个月至7年,LASIK和tPRK治疗的眼睛均出现轻度近视(-0.18 D和-0.36 D, p=0.24), LASIK (0.23 D)和tPRK (0.57 D)治疗的眼睛角膜度数变化差异(p=0.05)。结论:术后7年,LASIK组和tprk组均有良好的手术效果,但tprk组近视消退较LASIK组更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信