Can Elastosonography Be Useful in Improving Diagnosis and Prognosis of Acute Muscle Injuries?

Q1 Medicine
Joints Pub Date : 2018-06-22 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1660814
Marco Cianforlini, Serena Ulisse, Valentino Coppa, Marco Grassi, Marco Rotini, Antonio Gigante
{"title":"Can Elastosonography Be Useful in Improving Diagnosis and Prognosis of Acute Muscle Injuries?","authors":"Marco Cianforlini,&nbsp;Serena Ulisse,&nbsp;Valentino Coppa,&nbsp;Marco Grassi,&nbsp;Marco Rotini,&nbsp;Antonio Gigante","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1660814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of elastosonography (USE) in the identification of different grades of muscular injuries, comparing its effectiveness with traditional ultrasound (US) survey and by relating the results to the clinical classification of muscular pain. <b>Methods</b>  In the period between August 2014 and May 2016, we conducted a prospective cohort study on a population of 34 young male professional athletes belonging to the same under-17 football club (Ancona 1905). Injuries were recorded according to location, type, mechanism, recurrence, and whether they occurred with or without contact. Muscle pain was classified, after a physical examination, according to the classification of Mueller-Wohlfahrt et al. All athletes were evaluated by musculoskeletal US and USE in hours following the trauma/onset of pain. <b>Results</b>  Seventy injuries were documented among 19 players. Muscle/tendon injuries were the most common type of injury (49%). USE showed areas of edema in nine lesions that were negative at the US examination and previously classified as fatigue-induced muscle disorders. These nine players took more time to return to physical activity compared with others with injuries classified into the same group, but negative at USE evaluation. <b>Conclusion</b>  USE is a valuable aid in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of muscle injury, as it detects pathologic changes that are not visible with the B-mode US. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  This is a Level III, observational cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 2","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1660814","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose  The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of elastosonography (USE) in the identification of different grades of muscular injuries, comparing its effectiveness with traditional ultrasound (US) survey and by relating the results to the clinical classification of muscular pain. Methods  In the period between August 2014 and May 2016, we conducted a prospective cohort study on a population of 34 young male professional athletes belonging to the same under-17 football club (Ancona 1905). Injuries were recorded according to location, type, mechanism, recurrence, and whether they occurred with or without contact. Muscle pain was classified, after a physical examination, according to the classification of Mueller-Wohlfahrt et al. All athletes were evaluated by musculoskeletal US and USE in hours following the trauma/onset of pain. Results  Seventy injuries were documented among 19 players. Muscle/tendon injuries were the most common type of injury (49%). USE showed areas of edema in nine lesions that were negative at the US examination and previously classified as fatigue-induced muscle disorders. These nine players took more time to return to physical activity compared with others with injuries classified into the same group, but negative at USE evaluation. Conclusion  USE is a valuable aid in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of muscle injury, as it detects pathologic changes that are not visible with the B-mode US. Level of Evidence  This is a Level III, observational cohort study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

弹性超声能改善急性肌肉损伤的诊断和预后吗?
目的本研究的目的是探讨弹性超声(USE)识别不同级别肌肉损伤的能力,比较其与传统超声(US)调查的有效性,并将结果与肌肉疼痛的临床分类联系起来。方法2014年8月至2016年5月,我们对同一家u17足球俱乐部(Ancona 1905)的34名年轻男性职业运动员进行了前瞻性队列研究。根据损伤的部位、类型、机制、复发情况以及有无接触进行记录。体格检查后,根据Mueller-Wohlfahrt等人的分类对肌肉疼痛进行分类。所有运动员在创伤/疼痛发作后数小时内通过肌肉骨骼US和USE进行评估。结果19名运动员中有70例受伤。肌肉/肌腱损伤是最常见的损伤类型(49%)。USE显示9个病灶水肿区域,在US检查中为阴性,以前被归类为疲劳性肌肉疾病。这9名球员与其他同组受伤的球员相比,需要更多的时间才能恢复体力活动,但在USE评估中表现不佳。结论USE在肌肉损伤的诊断和预后评估中具有重要的辅助作用,因为它可以检测到b型超声不可见的病理变化。这是一项III级观察性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信