The Energy Density and Treatment Times Are the Main Factors That Affect the Efficacy of Long-Pulsed 1,064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Onychomycosis Caused by Trichophyton rubrum.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-24 DOI:10.1159/000489395
Chao Liu, Ling Zhang, Hai-Yan Zeng, Hong Bei, Shi-Ping Chen, Yi-Xi Wu, Wen-Xia Luo, Qing Fang, Pin-Mei Liu
{"title":"The Energy Density and Treatment Times Are the Main Factors That Affect the Efficacy of Long-Pulsed 1,064-nm Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Onychomycosis Caused by Trichophyton rubrum.","authors":"Chao Liu,&nbsp;Ling Zhang,&nbsp;Hai-Yan Zeng,&nbsp;Hong Bei,&nbsp;Shi-Ping Chen,&nbsp;Yi-Xi Wu,&nbsp;Wen-Xia Luo,&nbsp;Qing Fang,&nbsp;Pin-Mei Liu","doi":"10.1159/000489395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No optimal regimen exists for the LPNYL (long-pulsed 1,064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser) for treating onychomycosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish an optimal LPNYL treatment regimen for onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum (OCTr).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>First, 511 infected nails of 177 patients were treated using LPNYL with orthogonally designed regimens according to various energy densities, spot sizes, pulse widths, and treatment times. The optimal treatment regimen was established by multivariate analysis. Next, 69 patients with 221 infected nails were randomized to receive oral itraconazole (drug group) and the optimal regimen of LPNYL treatment (laser group). The clinical efficacy (CE) and mycological efficacy (ME) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months following the start of treatment, and adverse reactions were recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CE and ME were significantly correlated with the energy density (p < 0.05) and treatment times (p < 0.05), but not with the spot size (0.071 < p < 0.083) or pulse width (0.051 < p < 0.060), at 6 or 12 months. There were no significant differences at 6 or 12 months (p > 0.05), and no significant difference was observed in CE at 12 months between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 6 months, the CE in the laser group was significantly higher than that in the drug group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LPNYL is effective and safe for treating OCTr. The energy density and treatment times are the main factors that affect the efficacy. The optimal regimen for LPNYL is an energy density of 45 J/cm2, pulse width of 35 ms, spot size of 4 mm, frequency of 1 Hz, and 6 treatments with 1-week intervals. Laser treatment has rapid clinical recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000489395","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000489395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: No optimal regimen exists for the LPNYL (long-pulsed 1,064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser) for treating onychomycosis.

Objective: To establish an optimal LPNYL treatment regimen for onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum (OCTr).

Patients and methods: First, 511 infected nails of 177 patients were treated using LPNYL with orthogonally designed regimens according to various energy densities, spot sizes, pulse widths, and treatment times. The optimal treatment regimen was established by multivariate analysis. Next, 69 patients with 221 infected nails were randomized to receive oral itraconazole (drug group) and the optimal regimen of LPNYL treatment (laser group). The clinical efficacy (CE) and mycological efficacy (ME) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months following the start of treatment, and adverse reactions were recorded in both groups.

Results: Both CE and ME were significantly correlated with the energy density (p < 0.05) and treatment times (p < 0.05), but not with the spot size (0.071 < p < 0.083) or pulse width (0.051 < p < 0.060), at 6 or 12 months. There were no significant differences at 6 or 12 months (p > 0.05), and no significant difference was observed in CE at 12 months between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 6 months, the CE in the laser group was significantly higher than that in the drug group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: LPNYL is effective and safe for treating OCTr. The energy density and treatment times are the main factors that affect the efficacy. The optimal regimen for LPNYL is an energy density of 45 J/cm2, pulse width of 35 ms, spot size of 4 mm, frequency of 1 Hz, and 6 treatments with 1-week intervals. Laser treatment has rapid clinical recovery.

能量密度和治疗次数是影响长脉冲1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗红毛癣(Trichophyton rubrum)甲真菌病疗效的主要因素。
背景:LPNYL(长脉冲1064 nm钕钇铝石榴石激光)治疗甲真菌病没有最佳方案。目的:建立棕毛癣(Trichophyton rubrum, OCTr)所致甲真菌病的最佳治疗方案。患者与方法:首先,根据不同的能量密度、光斑大小、脉宽和治疗次数,采用正交设计的LPNYL治疗177例511枚感染指甲。通过多因素分析确定最佳治疗方案。选择69例感染指甲221例,随机分为口服伊曲康唑组(药物组)和最佳方案LPNYL治疗组(激光组)。在治疗开始后6个月和12个月评估两组的临床疗效(CE)和真菌学疗效(ME),并记录不良反应。结果:6、12个月时CE、ME与能量密度(p < 0.05)、治疗次数(p < 0.05)均有显著相关性,与斑大小(0.071 < p < 0.083)、脉宽(0.051 < p < 0.060)无显著相关性。6、12个月时两组比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05), 12个月时两组CE比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。6个月时,激光组CE显著高于药物组(p < 0.001)。结论:LPNYL治疗OCTr安全有效。能量密度和处理次数是影响疗效的主要因素。LPNYL的最佳治疗方案是能量密度为45 J/cm2,脉宽为35 ms,光斑大小为4 mm,频率为1 Hz,每隔1周治疗6次。激光治疗临床恢复快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信