Corrigendum: Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert.

1区心理学 Q1 Psychology

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society Pub Date : 2018-11-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-19 DOI:10.1177/1529100618786959

{"title":"Corrigendum: Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/1529100618786959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Original article: Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5-51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271 On page 23, in the left column, at the beginning of the first full paragraph, four sentences were inadvertently omitted during the editing process. Those sentences are as follows: This characterization changes substantially in cases of words with more than one morpheme. Morphemes are the minimum meaning-bearing units in English (e.g., darkness consists of the morphemes {dark}+{-ness}). For these words, there are underlying regularities between spelling and meaning. These regular patterns emerge because stems occur and reoccur in words with similar meanings (e.g., clean, unclean, cleaner, cleanliness), and affixes alter the meanings of stems in highly predictable ways (e.g., unhook, unlock, unscrew; Rastle, Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Tyler, 2000). This error has been corrected.","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100618786959","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618786959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Original article: Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5-51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271 On page 23, in the left column, at the beginning of the first full paragraph, four sentences were inadvertently omitted during the editing process. Those sentences are as follows: This characterization changes substantially in cases of words with more than one morpheme. Morphemes are the minimum meaning-bearing units in English (e.g., darkness consists of the morphemes {dark}+{-ness}). For these words, there are underlying regularities between spelling and meaning. These regular patterns emerge because stems occur and reoccur in words with similar meanings (e.g., clean, unclean, cleaner, cleanliness), and affixes alter the meanings of stems in highly predictable ways (e.g., unhook, unlock, unscrew; Rastle, Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Tyler, 2000). This error has been corrected.

查看原文本刊更多论文

勘误:结束阅读战争:从新手到专家的阅读习得。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

68.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Psychological Science in the Public Interest (PSPI) is a unique journal featuring comprehensive and compelling reviews of issues that are of direct relevance to the general public. These reviews are written by blue ribbon teams of specialists representing a range of viewpoints, and are intended to assess the current state-of-the-science with regard to the topic. Among other things, PSPI reports have challenged the validity of the Rorschach and other projective tests; have explored how to keep the aging brain sharp; and have documented problems with the current state of clinical psychology. PSPI reports are regularly featured in Scientific American Mind and are typically covered in a variety of other major media outlets.