Michael Muntifering, Daniel Castranova, Gregory A. Gibson, Evan Meyer, Matthew Kofron, Alan M. Watson
下载PDF
{"title":"Clearing for Deep Tissue Imaging","authors":"Michael Muntifering, Daniel Castranova, Gregory A. Gibson, Evan Meyer, Matthew Kofron, Alan M. Watson","doi":"10.1002/cpcy.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biologic tissues are generally opaque due to optical properties that result in scattering and absorption of light. Preparation of tissues for optical microscopy often involves sectioning to a thickness of 50-100 µm, the practical limits of light penetration and recovery. A researcher who wishes to image a whole tissue must acquire potentially hundreds of individual sections before rendering them into a three-dimensional volume. Clearing removes strongly light-scattering and light-absorbing components of a tissue and equalizes the refractive index of the imaging medium to that of the tissue. After clearing, the maximum depth of imaging is often defined by the microscope optics rather than the tissue. Such visibility enables the interrogation of whole tissues and even animals without the need to section. Researchers can study a biological process in the context of its three-dimensional environment, identify rare events in large volumes of tissues, and trace cells and cell-cell interactions over large distances. This article describes four popular clearing protocols that are relevant to a wide variety of scenarios across biologic disciplines: CUBIC, CLARITY, 3DISCO, and SeeDB. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11020,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpcy.38","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpcy.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Biologic tissues are generally opaque due to optical properties that result in scattering and absorption of light. Preparation of tissues for optical microscopy often involves sectioning to a thickness of 50-100 µm, the practical limits of light penetration and recovery. A researcher who wishes to image a whole tissue must acquire potentially hundreds of individual sections before rendering them into a three-dimensional volume. Clearing removes strongly light-scattering and light-absorbing components of a tissue and equalizes the refractive index of the imaging medium to that of the tissue. After clearing, the maximum depth of imaging is often defined by the microscope optics rather than the tissue. Such visibility enables the interrogation of whole tissues and even animals without the need to section. Researchers can study a biological process in the context of its three-dimensional environment, identify rare events in large volumes of tissues, and trace cells and cell-cell interactions over large distances. This article describes four popular clearing protocols that are relevant to a wide variety of scenarios across biologic disciplines: CUBIC, CLARITY, 3DISCO, and SeeDB. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
深层组织成像清理
生物组织通常是不透明的,因为光学特性会导致光的散射和吸收。用于光学显微镜的组织制备通常需要切片至50-100 μ m的厚度,这是光穿透和恢复的实际极限。想要对整个组织成像的研究人员,在将其绘制成三维体积之前,必须获得数百个单独的切片。清除去除组织的强光散射和光吸收成分,并使成像介质的折射率与组织的折射率相等。清除后,成像的最大深度通常由显微镜光学而不是组织来确定。这种可见性使整个组织甚至动物的审讯不需要切片。研究人员可以在三维环境中研究生物过程,识别大量组织中的罕见事件,并在远距离上追踪细胞和细胞间的相互作用。本文描述了四种流行的清除协议,它们与生物学学科的各种场景相关:CUBIC、CLARITY、3DISCO和SeeDB。©2018 by John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。