Management of Breakthrough Pain in Hospitalized Older Adults.

Tran H Tran, Anne Reda
{"title":"Management of Breakthrough Pain in Hospitalized Older Adults.","authors":"Tran H Tran,&nbsp;Anne Reda","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2018.376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The appropriateness of analgesic administrations based on pain score and medication order in older adults during hospitalization was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>As-needed analgesic administrations for geriatric patients on hospitalist general medicine services at a large-university-affiliated medical center from January 1 to March 31, 2015, were included.</p><p><strong>Practice description: </strong>The hospital is a level one trauma center with more than 500 beds serving an area of more than 500,000 people, 12% of whom are 65 years of age or older. At our institution, breakthrough pain is treated with as-needed analgesic medications based on pain scores specified by the ordering provider. Medication should be given according to which order contains the patient-reported severity of pain.</p><p><strong>Practice innovation: </strong>This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of 430 analgesic medication administrations in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Incidence of appropriate medication administration based on pain score report and active medication orders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As-needed analgesic medications were given appropriately 44% of the time based on patient-reported pain score and active medication order. An active medication order was missing to treat the pain score reported by the patient 29% of the time. Out of 430 analgesic administrations, improvement in pain occurred 26% of the time. Pain was reassessed one hour after administration for almost 33% of the orders. Of those, 73% showed an improvement in pain score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate a large discrepancy for hospitalized older adults in what medication is administered compared with what is ordered for as-needed pain treatment. Missing orders contributed to almost one third of inappropriate medication administrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45985,"journal":{"name":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.376","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONSULTANT PHARMACIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2018.376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The appropriateness of analgesic administrations based on pain score and medication order in older adults during hospitalization was evaluated.

Setting: As-needed analgesic administrations for geriatric patients on hospitalist general medicine services at a large-university-affiliated medical center from January 1 to March 31, 2015, were included.

Practice description: The hospital is a level one trauma center with more than 500 beds serving an area of more than 500,000 people, 12% of whom are 65 years of age or older. At our institution, breakthrough pain is treated with as-needed analgesic medications based on pain scores specified by the ordering provider. Medication should be given according to which order contains the patient-reported severity of pain.

Practice innovation: This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of 430 analgesic medication administrations in hospitalized older adults.

Main outcome measurements: Incidence of appropriate medication administration based on pain score report and active medication orders.

Results: As-needed analgesic medications were given appropriately 44% of the time based on patient-reported pain score and active medication order. An active medication order was missing to treat the pain score reported by the patient 29% of the time. Out of 430 analgesic administrations, improvement in pain occurred 26% of the time. Pain was reassessed one hour after administration for almost 33% of the orders. Of those, 73% showed an improvement in pain score.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a large discrepancy for hospitalized older adults in what medication is administered compared with what is ordered for as-needed pain treatment. Missing orders contributed to almost one third of inappropriate medication administrations.

住院老年人突发性疼痛的处理。
目的:评价老年人住院期间基于疼痛评分和用药顺序给药的适宜性。研究对象为2015年1月1日至3月31日在某大型大学附属医疗中心住院医师全科服务的老年患者按需镇痛药。实践描述:该医院是一家一级创伤中心,拥有500多张床位,服务面积超过50万人,其中12%的人年龄在65岁或以上。在我们的机构,突破性疼痛是根据订购提供者指定的疼痛评分使用所需镇痛药物治疗的。应根据患者报告的疼痛严重程度给药。实践创新:这是一项机构审查委员会批准的430例住院老年人镇痛药物管理的回顾性图表审查。主要结果测量:基于疼痛评分报告和积极用药单的适当用药发生率。结果:根据患者报告的疼痛评分和积极用药顺序,44%的时间给予适当的镇痛药物。29%的患者报告的疼痛评分缺少积极的药物治疗。在430种镇痛药中,26%的时间疼痛得到改善。在给药一小时后,近33%的病人重新评估了疼痛。其中73%的患者疼痛评分有所改善。结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于住院的老年人来说,使用何种药物与按需治疗疼痛的处方存在很大差异。缺少订单导致了近三分之一的药物管理不当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST
CONSULTANT PHARMACIST PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vision ... The Society"s long-term desire, aspiration, and core purpose. The vision of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists is optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. Mission ... The Society"s strategic position, focus, and reason for being. The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists empowers pharmacists to enhance quality of care for all older persons through the appropriate use of medication and the promotion of healthy aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信