The impact of affective symptoms on personal recovery of patients with severe mental illness.

Robin Michael Van Eck, Thijs Jan Burger, Marij Schenkelaars, Astrid Vellinga, Mariken Beatrijs de Koning, Frederike Schirmbeck, Martijn Kikkert, Jack Dekker, Lieuwe de Haan
{"title":"The impact of affective symptoms on personal recovery of patients with severe mental illness.","authors":"Robin Michael Van Eck,&nbsp;Thijs Jan Burger,&nbsp;Marij Schenkelaars,&nbsp;Astrid Vellinga,&nbsp;Mariken Beatrijs de Koning,&nbsp;Frederike Schirmbeck,&nbsp;Martijn Kikkert,&nbsp;Jack Dekker,&nbsp;Lieuwe de Haan","doi":"10.1177/0020764018784610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical recovery is often defined as remission of symptoms. Personal recovery is described as growing beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness, sometimes despite ongoing symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the relationship between the severity of clinical symptom domains and personal recovery in patients with severe mental illness (SMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptom severity and personal recovery of 105 outpatients with SMI at Mentrum, part of Arkin Institute for Mental Health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded Version (BPRS-E) and the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM). Correlation and regression analyses were used to investigate the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiple regression analysis showed that only affective symptoms significantly predicted personal recovery, whereas neither positive nor negative symptom severity added to the explained variance in the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between affective symptoms and personal recovery in patients with SMI implies that treatment of affective symptoms may advance personal recovery, and/or support of personal recovery may improve mood, whereas focussing on treatment of psychotic symptoms might not be the key to personal recovery. More research is needed to elucidate causal interrelations.</p>","PeriodicalId":257862,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"521-527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0020764018784610","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018784610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Clinical recovery is often defined as remission of symptoms. Personal recovery is described as growing beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness, sometimes despite ongoing symptoms.

Aims: To examine the relationship between the severity of clinical symptom domains and personal recovery in patients with severe mental illness (SMI).

Methods: Symptom severity and personal recovery of 105 outpatients with SMI at Mentrum, part of Arkin Institute for Mental Health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded Version (BPRS-E) and the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM). Correlation and regression analyses were used to investigate the associations.

Results: The multiple regression analysis showed that only affective symptoms significantly predicted personal recovery, whereas neither positive nor negative symptom severity added to the explained variance in the model.

Conclusion: The association between affective symptoms and personal recovery in patients with SMI implies that treatment of affective symptoms may advance personal recovery, and/or support of personal recovery may improve mood, whereas focussing on treatment of psychotic symptoms might not be the key to personal recovery. More research is needed to elucidate causal interrelations.

情感性症状对重度精神疾病患者个人康复的影响。
背景:临床康复通常被定义为症状的缓解。个人康复被描述为超越精神疾病的灾难性影响,有时尽管有持续的症状。目的:探讨重度精神疾病(SMI)患者临床症状域的严重程度与个人康复的关系。方法:对荷兰阿姆斯特丹Arkin精神卫生研究所Mentrum门诊的105例重度精神分裂症患者进行症状严重程度和个人恢复评估,采用精神病学简易评定量表-扩展版(BPRS-E)和心理健康恢复量表(MHRM)。采用相关分析和回归分析探讨相关性。结果:多元回归分析显示,只有情感症状能显著预测个人康复,而阳性和阴性症状严重程度都不能增加模型的解释方差。结论:重度精神分裂症患者情感性症状与个人康复之间的关系表明,情感性症状的治疗可以促进个人康复,并且/或支持个人康复可以改善情绪,而专注于精神病性症状的治疗可能不是个人康复的关键。需要更多的研究来阐明因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信