Regional chemotherapy by isolated limb perfusion prior to surgery compared with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy for primary, locally advanced extremity sarcoma: a comparison of matched cohorts.

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2018-07-02 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-018-0098-6
Jens Jakob, Henry G Smith, Michelle J Wilkinson, Tim Pencavel, Aisha B Miah, Joseph M Thomas, Per-Ulf Tunn, Lothar R Pilz, Dirk C Strauss, Peter Hohenberger, Andrew J Hayes
{"title":"Regional chemotherapy by isolated limb perfusion prior to surgery compared with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy for primary, locally advanced extremity sarcoma: a comparison of matched cohorts.","authors":"Jens Jakob,&nbsp;Henry G Smith,&nbsp;Michelle J Wilkinson,&nbsp;Tim Pencavel,&nbsp;Aisha B Miah,&nbsp;Joseph M Thomas,&nbsp;Per-Ulf Tunn,&nbsp;Lothar R Pilz,&nbsp;Dirk C Strauss,&nbsp;Peter Hohenberger,&nbsp;Andrew J Hayes","doi":"10.1186/s13569-018-0098-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Induction chemotherapy by isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor-α is an effective strategy to facilitate limb-conserving surgery in locally advanced extremity sarcoma. In a comparison of cohorts matched for grade, size and surgical resectability, we compared the outcome of patients undergoing induction ILP prior to limb-conserving surgery and selective post-operative radiotherapy with patients undergoing limb-conserving surgery and routine post-operative radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with primary, grade 2/3 sarcomas of the lower limbs over 10 cm in size were identified from prospectively maintained databases at 3 centres. Patients treated at a UK centre underwent limb-conserving surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (Standard cohort). Patients at two German centres underwent induction ILP, limb-conserving surgery and selective post-operative radiotherapy (ILP cohort).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Standard cohort comprised 80 patients and the ILP cohort 44 patients. Both cohorts were closely matched in terms of tumour size, grade, histological subtype and surgical resectability. The median age was greater in the Standard vs the ILP cohort (60.5 years vs 56 years, p = 0.033). The median size was 13 cm in both cohorts. 5-year local-recurrence (ILP 12.2%, Standard 20.1%, p = 0.375) and distant metastases-free survival rates (ILP 49.6%, Standard 46.0% p = 0.821) did not differ significantly between cohorts. Fewer patients received post-operative radiotherapy in the ILP cohort compared with the Standard cohort (27% vs 82%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparative cohorts, the outcomes of patients undergoing induction ILP prior to surgery did not differ from those undergoing standard management, although induction ILP was associated with a reduced need for adjuvant radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-018-0098-6","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0098-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Induction chemotherapy by isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor-α is an effective strategy to facilitate limb-conserving surgery in locally advanced extremity sarcoma. In a comparison of cohorts matched for grade, size and surgical resectability, we compared the outcome of patients undergoing induction ILP prior to limb-conserving surgery and selective post-operative radiotherapy with patients undergoing limb-conserving surgery and routine post-operative radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients with primary, grade 2/3 sarcomas of the lower limbs over 10 cm in size were identified from prospectively maintained databases at 3 centres. Patients treated at a UK centre underwent limb-conserving surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (Standard cohort). Patients at two German centres underwent induction ILP, limb-conserving surgery and selective post-operative radiotherapy (ILP cohort).

Results: The Standard cohort comprised 80 patients and the ILP cohort 44 patients. Both cohorts were closely matched in terms of tumour size, grade, histological subtype and surgical resectability. The median age was greater in the Standard vs the ILP cohort (60.5 years vs 56 years, p = 0.033). The median size was 13 cm in both cohorts. 5-year local-recurrence (ILP 12.2%, Standard 20.1%, p = 0.375) and distant metastases-free survival rates (ILP 49.6%, Standard 46.0% p = 0.821) did not differ significantly between cohorts. Fewer patients received post-operative radiotherapy in the ILP cohort compared with the Standard cohort (27% vs 82%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In comparative cohorts, the outcomes of patients undergoing induction ILP prior to surgery did not differ from those undergoing standard management, although induction ILP was associated with a reduced need for adjuvant radiation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发性局部晚期肢体肉瘤术前局部肢体灌注局部化疗与手术和术后放疗的比较:匹配队列的比较
背景:美法兰联合肿瘤坏死因子-α的孤立肢体灌注诱导化疗是促进局部晚期肢体肉瘤保肢手术的有效策略。在分级、大小和手术可切除性相匹配的队列比较中,我们比较了在保肢手术和选择性术后放疗前接受诱导性ILP的患者与接受保肢手术和常规术后放疗的患者的结果。方法:从3个中心前瞻性维护的数据库中确定大小超过10cm的下肢原发性2/3级肉瘤患者。在英国中心接受治疗的患者接受保肢手术和术后放疗(标准队列)。两家德国中心的患者接受了诱导性ILP、保肢手术和选择性术后放疗(ILP队列)。结果:标准组80例,ILP组44例。两个队列在肿瘤大小、分级、组织学亚型和手术可切除性方面密切匹配。标准组的中位年龄大于ILP组(60.5岁vs 56岁,p = 0.033)。两个队列的中位尺寸均为13厘米。5年局部复发率(ILP 12.2%,标准20.1%,p = 0.375)和远处无转移生存率(ILP 49.6%,标准46.0% p = 0.821)在队列之间无显著差异。与标准队列相比,ILP队列中接受术后放疗的患者较少(27% vs 82%, p)。结论:在比较队列中,术前接受诱导ILP的患者的结果与接受标准治疗的患者没有差异,尽管诱导ILP与辅助放疗需求减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信