Real-Time Locating Systems and the Effects on Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.

Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-29
Cindy Yeoh, Jennifer Mascarenhas, Kay See Tan, Luis Tollinche
{"title":"Real-Time Locating Systems and the Effects on Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.","authors":"Cindy Yeoh,&nbsp;Jennifer Mascarenhas,&nbsp;Kay See Tan,&nbsp;Luis Tollinche","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of Real Time Locating System (RTLS) technology on the perioperative efficiency of anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed for all outpatient and short-stay patients who received General Anesthesia care at our institution between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients included were over 18 years and had ASA classification scores of 1, 2, and 3. Only first cases of the day for individual anesthesiologists were included. Duration between two perioperative time points was collected and used as a measure of efficiency. Two groups of anesthesiologists were compared <b>Group 1:</b> Anesthesiologists at Main Campus who do not use RTLS<b>Group 2:</b> Anesthesiologists at Josie Robertson Surgery Center who use RTLSThe outcome measure collected from patient electronic medical records was defined as <b>DUR:</b> Duration from when patient is admitted to the operating room and initiation of induction only for first case of the day by attending anesthesiologist. The outcome was compared between the two groups using Wilcoxon rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration between admission to the OR and initiation of induction was significantly shorter in JRSC (with RTLS) than main campus (without RTLS); specifically, median (25<sup>th</sup>, 75<sup>th</sup> percentile) of the duration was 7.0 (5.0, 10.0) at JRSC vs. 8.0 (6.0, 11.0) at main campus (p < 0.0001, Table 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our initial study, we found that anesthesiologists who had access to RTLS at JRSC performed more efficiently in their preoperative evaluation of patients as well as time to induction for general anesthesia cases. Because of various confounding factors that potentially influenced the increase in efficiency of anesthesiologists with access to RTLS, this follow-up study aims to eliminate several confounding factors by assessing only time to induction of general anesthesia for all first cases of the day by anesthesiologists. We continue to find a small yet statistically significant difference in time to induction of anesthesiologists with access to RTLS. This translates directly into increased efficiency in perioperative workflow. Additional investigation and application can help elucidate the true value of RTLS on workflow efficiency in the healthcare setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":92399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","volume":"2 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of Real Time Locating System (RTLS) technology on the perioperative efficiency of anesthesiologists.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all outpatient and short-stay patients who received General Anesthesia care at our institution between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients included were over 18 years and had ASA classification scores of 1, 2, and 3. Only first cases of the day for individual anesthesiologists were included. Duration between two perioperative time points was collected and used as a measure of efficiency. Two groups of anesthesiologists were compared Group 1: Anesthesiologists at Main Campus who do not use RTLSGroup 2: Anesthesiologists at Josie Robertson Surgery Center who use RTLSThe outcome measure collected from patient electronic medical records was defined as DUR: Duration from when patient is admitted to the operating room and initiation of induction only for first case of the day by attending anesthesiologist. The outcome was compared between the two groups using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: The duration between admission to the OR and initiation of induction was significantly shorter in JRSC (with RTLS) than main campus (without RTLS); specifically, median (25th, 75th percentile) of the duration was 7.0 (5.0, 10.0) at JRSC vs. 8.0 (6.0, 11.0) at main campus (p < 0.0001, Table 1).

Conclusion: In our initial study, we found that anesthesiologists who had access to RTLS at JRSC performed more efficiently in their preoperative evaluation of patients as well as time to induction for general anesthesia cases. Because of various confounding factors that potentially influenced the increase in efficiency of anesthesiologists with access to RTLS, this follow-up study aims to eliminate several confounding factors by assessing only time to induction of general anesthesia for all first cases of the day by anesthesiologists. We continue to find a small yet statistically significant difference in time to induction of anesthesiologists with access to RTLS. This translates directly into increased efficiency in perioperative workflow. Additional investigation and application can help elucidate the true value of RTLS on workflow efficiency in the healthcare setting.

实时定位系统及其对麻醉师工作效率的影响。
目的:探讨实时定位系统(RTLS)技术对麻醉医师围手术期工作效率的影响。方法:对2016年1月至2017年10月在我院接受全麻治疗的门诊和短期住院患者进行回顾性分析。纳入的患者年龄超过18岁,ASA评分为1、2和3分。仅包括单个麻醉师当天的第一例病例。收集两个围手术期时间点之间的时间,并将其作为疗效的衡量标准。将两组麻醉师进行比较,第一组:主校区麻醉师不使用rtls第二组:Josie Robertson手术中心麻醉师使用rtls。从患者电子病历中收集的结果指标定义为DUR:从患者进入手术室到仅在当天第一个病例中由主治麻醉师开始诱导的持续时间。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组结果。结果:JRSC(有RTLS)患者入手术室至诱导开始的时间明显短于主校区(无RTLS);具体来说,持续时间的中位数(25、75百分位)在JRSC为7.0(5.0、10.0),而在主校区为8.0(6.0、11.0)(p < 0.0001,表1)。结论:在我们的初步研究中,我们发现在JRSC使用RTLS的麻醉师在术前评估患者以及全麻病例诱导时间方面表现得更有效。由于各种混杂因素可能会影响麻醉师使用RTLS的效率的提高,本随访研究旨在通过仅评估麻醉师当天所有首次病例的全麻诱导时间来消除几个混杂因素。我们继续发现使用RTLS的麻醉师在诱导时间上存在小而有统计学意义的差异。这直接转化为提高围手术期工作流程的效率。进一步的调查和应用可以帮助阐明RTLS在医疗保健环境中对工作流程效率的真正价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信