Continuous Cryotherapy vs Ice Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Randomized Control Trial.

Matthew P Noyes, Patrick J Denard
{"title":"Continuous Cryotherapy vs Ice Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Matthew P Noyes,&nbsp;Patrick J Denard","doi":"10.12788/ajo.2018.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pain management is an important component of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Continuous cryotherapy (CC) has been proposed as a means of improving postoperative pain control. However, CC represents an increased cost not typically covered by insurance. The purpose of this study is to compare CC to plain ice (ICE) following TSA. The hypothesis was that CC would lead to lower pain scores and decreased narcotic usage during the first 2 weeks postoperatively. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare CC to ICE. Forty patients were randomized to receive either CC or ICE following TSA. The rehabilitation and pain control protocols were otherwise standardized. Visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, satisfaction with cold therapy, and quality of sleep were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days following surgery. Narcotic usage in morphine equivalents was also recorded. No significant differences in preoperative pain (5.9 vs 6.8; P = .121), or postoperative pain at 24 hours (4.2 vs 4.3; P = .989), 3 days (4.8 vs 4.7; P = .944), 7 days (2.9 vs 3.3; P = .593) or 14 days (2.5 vs 2.7; P = .742) were observed between the CC and ICE groups. Similarly, no differences in quality of sleep, satisfaction with the cold therapy, or narcotic usage at any time interval were observed between the 2 groups. No differences in pain control, quality of sleep, patient satisfaction, or narcotic usage were detected between CC and ICE following TSA. CC may offer convenience as an advantage, but the increased cost associated with this type of treatment may not be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":79316,"journal":{"name":"American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)","volume":"47 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/ajo.2018.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Postoperative pain management is an important component of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Continuous cryotherapy (CC) has been proposed as a means of improving postoperative pain control. However, CC represents an increased cost not typically covered by insurance. The purpose of this study is to compare CC to plain ice (ICE) following TSA. The hypothesis was that CC would lead to lower pain scores and decreased narcotic usage during the first 2 weeks postoperatively. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare CC to ICE. Forty patients were randomized to receive either CC or ICE following TSA. The rehabilitation and pain control protocols were otherwise standardized. Visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, satisfaction with cold therapy, and quality of sleep were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days following surgery. Narcotic usage in morphine equivalents was also recorded. No significant differences in preoperative pain (5.9 vs 6.8; P = .121), or postoperative pain at 24 hours (4.2 vs 4.3; P = .989), 3 days (4.8 vs 4.7; P = .944), 7 days (2.9 vs 3.3; P = .593) or 14 days (2.5 vs 2.7; P = .742) were observed between the CC and ICE groups. Similarly, no differences in quality of sleep, satisfaction with the cold therapy, or narcotic usage at any time interval were observed between the 2 groups. No differences in pain control, quality of sleep, patient satisfaction, or narcotic usage were detected between CC and ICE following TSA. CC may offer convenience as an advantage, but the increased cost associated with this type of treatment may not be justified.

全肩关节置换术后持续冷冻治疗与冰敷:一项随机对照试验。
术后疼痛管理是全肩关节置换术(TSA)的重要组成部分。持续冷冻治疗(CC)已被提出作为改善术后疼痛控制的手段。但是,CC所代表的增加费用通常不在保险范围内。本研究的目的是比较CC和普通冰(ice)在TSA后。假设CC会导致术后前2周疼痛评分降低和麻醉使用减少。进行了一项随机对照试验来比较CC和ICE。40例患者在TSA后随机接受CC或ICE治疗。康复和疼痛控制方案是标准化的。术前、术后24小时、3天、7天和14天分别记录疼痛、冷疗法满意度和睡眠质量的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。吗啡等价物的麻醉使用也被记录。术前疼痛无显著差异(5.9 vs 6.8;P = 0.121),或术后24小时疼痛(4.2 vs 4.3;P = .989), 3天(4.8 vs 4.7;P = .944), 7天(2.9 vs 3.3;P = .593)或14天(2.5 vs 2.7;P = .742)。同样,两组在任何时间间隔的睡眠质量、对冷敷的满意度或麻醉使用方面均无差异。在TSA后,CC组和ICE组在疼痛控制、睡眠质量、患者满意度或麻醉品使用方面没有发现差异。CC可能提供方便作为一个优势,但与这种类型的治疗相关的成本增加可能是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信