Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal.

Amir Hossein Mirhashemi, Mohammad Hashem Hosseini, Nasim Chiniforoush, Armin Soudi, Meisam Moradi
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal.","authors":"Amir Hossein Mirhashemi,&nbsp;Mohammad Hashem Hosseini,&nbsp;Nasim Chiniforoush,&nbsp;Armin Soudi,&nbsp;Meisam Moradi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":30286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Rebonding of isolated brackets is an economic option that can be conducted using available in-office or commercial recycling methods. Nowadays, lasers are known as an efficient modality for composite removal, but there is not much information available about using lasers for removal of adhesive remnants from the ceramic bracket base.

Materials and methods: Fifty human premolar teeth were divided into five groups. Samples in all groups were bonded to ceramic brackets. Brackets in four groups were debonded and the remaining adhesive was removed by Er:YAG laser, Er;Cr:YSGG laser, sandblasting or direct flame. After removing adhesives from the tooth surfaces by carbide bur, the recycled brackets were bonded again. in the control group, new ceramic brackets were bonded. Finally, all brackets were debonded by universal testing machine and their shear bond strength (SBS) was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was calculated under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification. Data were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey's test.

Results: SRS values showed no significant difference among the five groups (P=0.568). The highest SRS was noted in the control group (7.46±1.4 MPa), followed by Er:YAG laser group (7.40±1.24 Mpa) and the lowest was noted in the flame group (6.32±2.3 Mpa). ARI scores indicated that most of the adhesive remained on the tooth surface in all groups.

Conclusions: Recycling of ceramic brackets with Er:YAG laser is an efficient in-office method which causes the least damage to the bracket base. However, all methods of bracket recycling showed acceptable SBS.

四种不同去除胶粘剂方法对再粘合陶瓷支架剪切强度的影响。
目的:隔离支架的重新粘接是一种经济的选择,可以使用可用的办公室或商业回收方法进行。如今,激光被认为是一种有效的复合材料去除方式,但是关于使用激光去除陶瓷支架底座上的粘合剂残留物的信息并不多。材料与方法:50颗人前磨牙分为5组。所有组的样品都粘接在陶瓷支架上。采用Er:YAG激光、Er;Cr:YSGG激光、喷砂或直接火焰对四组支架进行脱粘,去除残余胶粘剂。用硬质合金钎剂去除牙面粘接剂后,将回收的托槽再次粘接。在对照组,新的陶瓷托槽粘接。最后,用万能试验机对支架进行脱粘,并测量支架的抗剪强度(SBS)。在×10放大的立体显微镜下计算黏着残余指数(ARI)。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验。结果:五组间SRS值差异无统计学意义(P=0.568)。SRS以对照组最高(7.46±1.4 MPa), Er:YAG激光组次之(7.40±1.24 MPa),火焰组最低(6.32±2.3 MPa)。ARI评分显示,所有组的粘接剂大部分留在牙表面。结论:Er:YAG激光回收陶瓷托槽是一种有效的原位修复方法,对托槽底座的损伤最小。然而,所有的支架回收方法都显示出可接受的SBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信