Evaluation of Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate After Immediate Placement of Different Coronal Restorations: An In Vitro Study.

Maryam Kazemipoor, Niloofar Azizi, Farnaz Farahat
{"title":"Evaluation of Microhardness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate After Immediate Placement of Different Coronal Restorations: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Maryam Kazemipoor,&nbsp;Niloofar Azizi,&nbsp;Farnaz Farahat","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of immediate placement of different restorative materials in comparison with a temporary restoration on the surface microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Access cavities were prepared in 40 extracted human molars, and a 3-mm layer of MTA was placed in the pulp chamber. The samples were divided into eight groups (n=5). Ten minutes after the MTA placement, two groups were restored with Zonalin temporary restoration, while the other six groups were restored with glass-ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI), or resin-based composite. In each group, the Vickers microhardness (VMH) of MTA was determined after 7 and 21 days. Data were entered into SPSS 17 software program and were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significance level was set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of restorative materials had a statistically significant effect on the microhardness of MTA (P=0.002). However, the microhardness of MTA was neither significantly influenced by the timing of final restoration (P=0.246) nor by the time-material interaction (P=0.116).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of the present study and by considering the limitations of laboratory studies, it is recommended to postpone the placement of final restorations until the underlying MTA is completely set. Otherwise, in the clinical conditions in which early covering of MTA is recommended, sufficient moist-curing and hydration should be guaranteed by selecting a restorative material with the lowest hydrophilic interaction energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":30286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of immediate placement of different restorative materials in comparison with a temporary restoration on the surface microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

Materials and methods: Access cavities were prepared in 40 extracted human molars, and a 3-mm layer of MTA was placed in the pulp chamber. The samples were divided into eight groups (n=5). Ten minutes after the MTA placement, two groups were restored with Zonalin temporary restoration, while the other six groups were restored with glass-ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI), or resin-based composite. In each group, the Vickers microhardness (VMH) of MTA was determined after 7 and 21 days. Data were entered into SPSS 17 software program and were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significance level was set at 5%.

Results: The type of restorative materials had a statistically significant effect on the microhardness of MTA (P=0.002). However, the microhardness of MTA was neither significantly influenced by the timing of final restoration (P=0.246) nor by the time-material interaction (P=0.116).

Conclusions: Based on the results of the present study and by considering the limitations of laboratory studies, it is recommended to postpone the placement of final restorations until the underlying MTA is completely set. Otherwise, in the clinical conditions in which early covering of MTA is recommended, sufficient moist-curing and hydration should be guaranteed by selecting a restorative material with the lowest hydrophilic interaction energy.

即刻放置不同冠状体修复体后三氧化矿骨料显微硬度的评价:体外研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估即刻放置不同修复材料与临时修复对矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)表面显微硬度的影响。材料与方法:在40颗拔除的人磨牙中制备通道腔,在牙髓腔内放置3mm的MTA层。将样本分为8组(n=5)。MTA放置10分钟后,两组采用Zonalin临时修复,而其他六组采用玻璃离子水门体水泥(GIC),树脂改性玻璃离子水门体(RMGI)或树脂基复合材料修复。各组分别于第7天和第21天测定MTA的维氏显微硬度(VMH)。数据输入SPSS 17软件,采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析。显著性水平设为5%。结果:修复材料类型对MTA显微硬度的影响有统计学意义(P=0.002)。然而,MTA显微硬度既不受最终修复时间(P=0.246)的显著影响,也不受时间-材料相互作用(P=0.116)的显著影响。结论:基于本研究的结果,并考虑到实验室研究的局限性,建议推迟最终修复体的放置,直到底层MTA完全固定。否则,在建议早期覆盖MTA的临床条件下,应选择亲水相互作用能最低的修复材料,以保证充分的湿固化和水化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信