Media reporting of suicide and adherence to media guidelines.

Niall McTernan, Ailbhe Spillane, Grace Cully, Eimear Cusack, Theresa O'Reilly, Ella Arensman
{"title":"Media reporting of suicide and adherence to media guidelines.","authors":"Niall McTernan,&nbsp;Ailbhe Spillane,&nbsp;Grace Cully,&nbsp;Eimear Cusack,&nbsp;Theresa O'Reilly,&nbsp;Ella Arensman","doi":"10.1177/0020764018784624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International research consistently shows evidence for an association between sensationalised and detailed media reporting, and suicidal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examined the quality of media reporting of suicide and adherence to media guidelines in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the criteria outlined in the media guidelines for reporting suicide, 243 media articles were screened and analysed for quality of reporting of two high-profile cases of suicide and two cases of suicide that became high profile following a period of intense media coverage that occurred between September 2009 and December 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A minority of articles breached the media guidelines in relation to sensationalised language (11.8%), placement of reports on the front page of the newspaper (9.5%), publishing of inappropriate photographs (4.2%) and mention of location of suicide (2.4%), while no articles disclosed the contents of a suicide note. However, in the majority of articles analysed, journalists did not refer to appropriate support services for people vulnerable to, and at risk of suicide (75.8%) or mention wider issues that are related to suicidal behaviour (53.8%). Overemphasis of community grief (48.3%) was also common. Nearly all articles (99.2%) breached at least one guideline and 58.9% of articles breached three or more guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, adherence to media guidelines on reporting suicide in Ireland improved in certain key areas from September 2009 until December 2012. Nonetheless, important challenges remain. Increased monitoring by media monitoring agencies, regulators and government departments is required. Implementation should be conducted using a pro-active approach and form part of the curriculum of journalists and editors. The inclusion of guidelines for the reporting of suicidal behaviour in press codes of conduct for journalists warrants consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":257862,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"536-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0020764018784624","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018784624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Background: International research consistently shows evidence for an association between sensationalised and detailed media reporting, and suicidal behaviour.

Aim: This study examined the quality of media reporting of suicide and adherence to media guidelines in Ireland.

Methods: In accordance with the criteria outlined in the media guidelines for reporting suicide, 243 media articles were screened and analysed for quality of reporting of two high-profile cases of suicide and two cases of suicide that became high profile following a period of intense media coverage that occurred between September 2009 and December 2012.

Results: A minority of articles breached the media guidelines in relation to sensationalised language (11.8%), placement of reports on the front page of the newspaper (9.5%), publishing of inappropriate photographs (4.2%) and mention of location of suicide (2.4%), while no articles disclosed the contents of a suicide note. However, in the majority of articles analysed, journalists did not refer to appropriate support services for people vulnerable to, and at risk of suicide (75.8%) or mention wider issues that are related to suicidal behaviour (53.8%). Overemphasis of community grief (48.3%) was also common. Nearly all articles (99.2%) breached at least one guideline and 58.9% of articles breached three or more guidelines.

Conclusion: Overall, adherence to media guidelines on reporting suicide in Ireland improved in certain key areas from September 2009 until December 2012. Nonetheless, important challenges remain. Increased monitoring by media monitoring agencies, regulators and government departments is required. Implementation should be conducted using a pro-active approach and form part of the curriculum of journalists and editors. The inclusion of guidelines for the reporting of suicidal behaviour in press codes of conduct for journalists warrants consideration.

媒体对自杀的报道和对媒体指导方针的遵守。
背景:国际研究一致表明,耸人听闻和详细的媒体报道与自杀行为之间存在关联。目的:本研究考察了爱尔兰媒体自杀报道的质量和对媒体指导方针的遵守情况。方法:根据媒体自杀报道指南中的标准,对2009年9月至2012年12月期间发生的两起备受关注的自杀案件和两起在媒体密集报道后成为备受关注的自杀案件的243篇媒体文章进行筛选和分析。结果:少数文章违反了媒体指南,涉及耸人听闻的语言(11.8%),在报纸头版放置报道(9.5%),发布不适当的照片(4.2%)和提到自杀地点(2.4%),而没有文章披露自杀遗书的内容。然而,在分析的大多数文章中,记者没有提到为易受自杀和有自杀风险的人(75.8%)提供适当的支持服务,也没有提到与自杀行为有关的更广泛的问题(53.8%)。过度强调社区悲伤(48.3%)也很常见。几乎所有的文章(99.2%)至少违反了一条准则,58.9%的文章违反了三条或更多准则。结论:总体而言,从2009年9月到2012年12月,爱尔兰在某些关键领域对媒体报告自杀指南的遵守情况有所改善。尽管如此,重要的挑战依然存在。需要媒体监督机构、监管机构和政府部门加强监督。执行工作应以积极主动的方式进行,并应成为记者和编辑课程的一部分。在新闻记者行为守则中列入报告自杀行为的准则值得考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信