Analyzing Volatile Anesthetic Consumption by Auditing Fresh Gas Flow: An Observational Study at an Academic Hospital.

Luis Tollinche, KaySee Tan, Austin Han, Leslie Ojea, Cindy Yeoh
{"title":"Analyzing Volatile Anesthetic Consumption by Auditing Fresh Gas Flow: An Observational Study at an Academic Hospital.","authors":"Luis Tollinche,&nbsp;KaySee Tan,&nbsp;Austin Han,&nbsp;Leslie Ojea,&nbsp;Cindy Yeoh","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a climate of cost containment, it is critical to analyze and optimize all perioperative variable costs. Fresh gas flow is one important variable that determines utilization of inhalational agents and can be tightly controlled by the anesthesia provider. Manufacturers of inhalational agents have recommendations for minimum gas flow for their respective agents. Any gas flow above these recommendations is considered misuse and leads to unnecessary expense. The purpose of this study was to characterize and quantify the excess use of inhalational agents by analyzing fresh gas flow rates for long duration cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a span of three months, operating room records were analyzed for all procedures lasting greater than 4 hours. End tidal inhalation agent percentage for Sevoflurane and Isoflurane and fresh gas flows were analyzed. 303 unique patients with at least 4 hours of anesthesia time were included. Analysis excluded the first and last 30 minutes of all anesthetics to account for need for higher gas flows during induction/emergence of anesthesia. 152 patients received sevoflurane alone. 33 patients received isoflurane alone. 107 patients received both isoflurane and sevoflurane and were included in sevoflurane group given the higher gas flow needs of sevoflurane. 11 patients received neither agent and were excluded from analysis. We proceed with n = 292 unique patients. (259 in Sevo, 33 in iso) We used the two-sided one sample t-test setting 2 ml/min as the null for sevo and 1 ml/min as the null for iso; we ran analysis using a nonparametric test that didn't require the fresh gas flow to be normally distributed - the two-sided one-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test: p value = < 0.0001.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of our study revealed a sevoflurane (n = 259) mean fresh gas flow (L/min) 2.55 (95% CI, 2.45-2.66) - significantly different from null of 2 ml/min (p < 0.0001). Isoflurane (n = 33) mean fresh gas flows (L/min) 2.33 (95% CI, 2.00-2.66) - significantly different from null of 1 l/min (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Manufacturer recommendation for sevoflurane is to maintain gas flows 1-2 l/min and Isoflurane at above 1 l/min. Given these recommendations, the anesthesia providers delivered fresh gas flows at least 28% higher than necessary for sevoflurane and at least 130% greater than necessary for isoflurane anesthetics that lasted greater than 4 hours. This is an area where cost reduction can be readily achieved. Future plans to realize a reduction in inhalational agent utilization include education of the benefits of fresh gas flow and instituting a low fresh gas flow policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/d6/nihms969072.PMC6020703.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: In a climate of cost containment, it is critical to analyze and optimize all perioperative variable costs. Fresh gas flow is one important variable that determines utilization of inhalational agents and can be tightly controlled by the anesthesia provider. Manufacturers of inhalational agents have recommendations for minimum gas flow for their respective agents. Any gas flow above these recommendations is considered misuse and leads to unnecessary expense. The purpose of this study was to characterize and quantify the excess use of inhalational agents by analyzing fresh gas flow rates for long duration cases.

Methods: Over a span of three months, operating room records were analyzed for all procedures lasting greater than 4 hours. End tidal inhalation agent percentage for Sevoflurane and Isoflurane and fresh gas flows were analyzed. 303 unique patients with at least 4 hours of anesthesia time were included. Analysis excluded the first and last 30 minutes of all anesthetics to account for need for higher gas flows during induction/emergence of anesthesia. 152 patients received sevoflurane alone. 33 patients received isoflurane alone. 107 patients received both isoflurane and sevoflurane and were included in sevoflurane group given the higher gas flow needs of sevoflurane. 11 patients received neither agent and were excluded from analysis. We proceed with n = 292 unique patients. (259 in Sevo, 33 in iso) We used the two-sided one sample t-test setting 2 ml/min as the null for sevo and 1 ml/min as the null for iso; we ran analysis using a nonparametric test that didn't require the fresh gas flow to be normally distributed - the two-sided one-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test: p value = < 0.0001.

Results: The results of our study revealed a sevoflurane (n = 259) mean fresh gas flow (L/min) 2.55 (95% CI, 2.45-2.66) - significantly different from null of 2 ml/min (p < 0.0001). Isoflurane (n = 33) mean fresh gas flows (L/min) 2.33 (95% CI, 2.00-2.66) - significantly different from null of 1 l/min (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Manufacturer recommendation for sevoflurane is to maintain gas flows 1-2 l/min and Isoflurane at above 1 l/min. Given these recommendations, the anesthesia providers delivered fresh gas flows at least 28% higher than necessary for sevoflurane and at least 130% greater than necessary for isoflurane anesthetics that lasted greater than 4 hours. This is an area where cost reduction can be readily achieved. Future plans to realize a reduction in inhalational agent utilization include education of the benefits of fresh gas flow and instituting a low fresh gas flow policy.

通过审计新鲜气体流量分析挥发性麻醉剂的消耗:一项学术医院的观察研究。
背景:在成本控制的环境下,分析和优化所有围手术期可变成本是至关重要的。新鲜气体流量是决定吸入性药物使用的一个重要变量,可以由麻醉提供者严格控制。吸入剂的制造商对各自药剂的最小气体流量有建议。任何超过这些建议的气体流量都被认为是误用,并导致不必要的费用。本研究的目的是通过分析长期病例的新鲜气体流速来表征和量化吸入性药物的过量使用。方法:对3个月来所有手术时间超过4小时的手术室记录进行分析。末端潮汐吸入剂对七氟醚和异氟醚的吸收率及新鲜气体流量进行了分析。303例患者麻醉时间至少为4小时。分析排除了所有麻醉药的最初和最后30分钟,以解释麻醉诱导/出现期间需要更高的气体流量。152例患者单独使用七氟醚。33例患者单独使用异氟醚。107例患者同时使用异氟醚和七氟醚,由于七氟醚的气体流量需求较高,被纳入七氟醚组。11例患者未接受任何药物治疗,并被排除在分析之外。我们继续研究n = 292例独特的患者。(259在Sevo中,33在iso中)我们使用双侧单样本t检验设置2ml /min为零,1ml /min为零。我们使用不要求新鲜气体流量为正态分布的非参数检验进行分析,即双侧单样本Wilcoxon秩和检验:p值= < 0.0001。结果:我们的研究结果显示,七氟醚(n = 259)的平均新鲜气体流量(L/min)为2.55 (95% CI, 2.45-2.66),与零值2 ml/min有显著差异(p < 0.0001)。异氟烷(n = 33)平均新鲜气体流量(L/min) 2.33 (95% CI, 2.00-2.66) -与零值1 L/min显著不同(p < 0.0001)。结论:七氟醚的推荐气量为1-2 l/min,异氟醚的推荐气量为1 l/min以上。考虑到这些建议,麻醉提供者提供的新鲜气体流量比持续时间超过4小时的七氟醚麻醉至少高28%,比异氟醚麻醉至少高130%。这是一个很容易实现成本降低的领域。未来实现减少吸入剂使用的计划包括教育新鲜气体流量的好处和制定低新鲜气体流量政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书