The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation.

Usharani Nimmagadda, M Ramez Salem, Dimitry Voronov, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
{"title":"The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation.","authors":"Usharani Nimmagadda,&nbsp;M Ramez Salem,&nbsp;Dimitry Voronov,&nbsp;Nebojsa Nick Knezevic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction is a widely accepted maneuver to\nincrease oxygen reserves and delay desaturation during apnea. There is limited data regarding the\nuse of the NuMask® in the perioperative setting, and no data as to its efficacy in achieving maximal\npreoxygenation. We hypothesize that the NuMask® may be a useful alternative to the face mask in\nachieving maximal preoxygenation.\nMethods: After IRB approval, the NuMask® was compared with the classic face mask\nwith respect to achieving maximal pre-oxygenation in 30 healthy volunteers using tidal volume\nbreathing. All volunteers were tested for three periods of 5 minutes intervals and the following\nparameters were recorded every 30 seconds: inspired, and end-tidal oxygen concentration and endtidal\ncarbon dioxide concentration.\nResults: The mean ETO2 of ≥90% was achieved with both masks at 3.5 minutes (SD =\n1.62 and 1.98 for facemask and NuMask® respectively) and thereafter the ETO2 remained above\n90%. There were no statistical differences noted in FiO2 and ETO2 between the face mask and the\nNuMask® in the same time periods. ETCO2 values were also not statistically different between the\ntwo masks.\nConclusions: The study showed that the NuMask® is as effective as the classic face mask in\nachieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing.\nIntroduction</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction is a widely accepted maneuver to increase oxygen reserves and delay desaturation during apnea. There is limited data regarding the use of the NuMask® in the perioperative setting, and no data as to its efficacy in achieving maximal preoxygenation. We hypothesize that the NuMask® may be a useful alternative to the face mask in achieving maximal preoxygenation. Methods: After IRB approval, the NuMask® was compared with the classic face mask with respect to achieving maximal pre-oxygenation in 30 healthy volunteers using tidal volume breathing. All volunteers were tested for three periods of 5 minutes intervals and the following parameters were recorded every 30 seconds: inspired, and end-tidal oxygen concentration and endtidal carbon dioxide concentration. Results: The mean ETO2 of ≥90% was achieved with both masks at 3.5 minutes (SD = 1.62 and 1.98 for facemask and NuMask® respectively) and thereafter the ETO2 remained above 90%. There were no statistical differences noted in FiO2 and ETO2 between the face mask and the NuMask® in the same time periods. ETCO2 values were also not statistically different between the two masks. Conclusions: The study showed that the NuMask® is as effective as the classic face mask in achieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing. Introduction

在实现最大的预充氧方面,NuMask®与面膜一样有效。
背景:麻醉诱导前预充氧是一种被广泛接受的增加氧气储备和延迟呼吸暂停期间去饱和的操作。关于NuMask®在围手术期使用的数据有限,也没有关于其在实现最大预充氧方面的有效性的数据。我们假设NuMask®可能是实现最大预充氧的面罩的有用替代方案。方法:经IRB批准后,将NuMask®与经典面罩在30名健康志愿者采用潮汐式容积呼吸实现最大预充氧方面进行比较。所有志愿者都进行了三次测试,每隔5分钟,每隔30秒记录一次以下参数:灵感、潮末氧浓度和潮末二氧化碳浓度。结果:两种口罩的平均ETO2均在3.5分钟达到≥90%(分别为1.62和1.98),此后ETO2保持在90%以上。在同一时间段内,面罩和theNuMask®之间的FiO2和ETO2没有统计学差异。两种面罩的ETCO2值也无统计学差异。结论:研究表明,在潮汐量呼吸时,NuMask®与传统面罩一样有效,无法实现最大预充氧。介绍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信