Effects of Circuit Leak Development Over Time and Response During Low-Flow Volume and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation.

Roland Kaddoum, Chadi I Yaacoub, George M McKelvey, Hong Wang
{"title":"Effects of Circuit Leak Development Over Time and Response During Low-Flow Volume and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation.","authors":"Roland Kaddoum,&nbsp;Chadi I Yaacoub,&nbsp;George M McKelvey,&nbsp;Hong Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study Objective: To study the effects of circuit leak development over time and response during volume and pressure controlled ventilation using low flow in human patient simulator and to examine the minimum fresh gas flow needed to compensate for such a leak.\n\nDesign/Setting: Prospective study using a patient Simulation Lab at Wayne State University.\n\nMeasurements: A human patient simulator was endotracheally intubated. The endotracheal\ntube (ETT) was connected to the Datex-Ohmeda AS/3 Anesthesia machine. The tidal volume was\nset to 500ml in the volume controlled trial and the pressure to 6cm H2O in the pressure controlled\ntrial. A hole was created in each experiment placed 10 cm after the inspiratory valve. Leaks were\nsimulated from holes using 4 different needle diameters: 25, 21, 18 and 16G. A series of data were\ncollected using fresh gas flow at 4 different flow rates (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 liters.min-1). Data was\nmeasured at different time points (baseline, 1, 3 and 5 minutes) in the series of simulated leaking\nbreathing circuits.\n\nResults: Leak alarms were only detected with 16G hole at 5 minutes in the volume control\nmode versus leaks at 3 minutes with 16G hole and at 5 minutes with 18G hole in the pressure\ncontrol mode.\n\nConclusion: When a very low flow of 0.5 L/min is used, volume control is safer than pressure control modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective: To study the effects of circuit leak development over time and response during volume and pressure controlled ventilation using low flow in human patient simulator and to examine the minimum fresh gas flow needed to compensate for such a leak. Design/Setting: Prospective study using a patient Simulation Lab at Wayne State University. Measurements: A human patient simulator was endotracheally intubated. The endotracheal tube (ETT) was connected to the Datex-Ohmeda AS/3 Anesthesia machine. The tidal volume was set to 500ml in the volume controlled trial and the pressure to 6cm H2O in the pressure controlled trial. A hole was created in each experiment placed 10 cm after the inspiratory valve. Leaks were simulated from holes using 4 different needle diameters: 25, 21, 18 and 16G. A series of data were collected using fresh gas flow at 4 different flow rates (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 liters.min-1). Data was measured at different time points (baseline, 1, 3 and 5 minutes) in the series of simulated leaking breathing circuits. Results: Leak alarms were only detected with 16G hole at 5 minutes in the volume control mode versus leaks at 3 minutes with 16G hole and at 5 minutes with 18G hole in the pressure control mode. Conclusion: When a very low flow of 0.5 L/min is used, volume control is safer than pressure control modes.

回路泄漏随时间发展的影响和响应在低流量和压力控制通风。
研究目的:研究在人体病人模拟器中使用低流量的容积和压力控制通风过程中电路泄漏随时间发展的影响和响应,并检查补偿这种泄漏所需的最小新鲜气体流量。设计/设置:使用韦恩州立大学患者模拟实验室进行前瞻性研究。测量方法:气管内插管人类患者模拟器。气管插管(ETT)连接Datex-Ohmeda AS/3麻醉机。量控试验时潮汐量为500ml,压控试验时压力为6cm H2O。在每个实验中,在吸气阀后10厘米处开一个孔。使用4种不同的针径:25、21、18和16G来模拟孔的泄漏。使用4种不同流量(0.5、1、1.5和2升。min-1)的新鲜气体流量收集了一系列数据。在一系列模拟泄漏呼吸回路的不同时间点(基线、1分钟、3分钟和5分钟)测量数据。结果:在体积控制模式下,16G孔在5分钟时仅检测到泄漏报警,而在压力控制模式下,16G孔在3分钟时检测到泄漏,18G孔在5分钟时检测到泄漏。结论:当使用0.5 L/min的极低流量时,体积控制比压力控制更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信