Illustrating Informed Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records Data: How Patient Interactions with a Health System Can Impact Inference.

Matthew Phelan, Nrupen A Bhavsar, Benjamin A Goldstein
{"title":"Illustrating Informed Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records Data: How Patient Interactions with a Health System Can Impact Inference.","authors":"Matthew Phelan,&nbsp;Nrupen A Bhavsar,&nbsp;Benjamin A Goldstein","doi":"10.5334/egems.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health record (EHR) data are becoming a primary resource for clinical research. Compared to traditional research data, such as those from clinical trials and epidemiologic cohorts, EHR data have a number of appealing characteristics. However, because they do not have mechanisms set in place to ensure that the appropriate data are collected, they also pose a number of analytic challenges. In this paper, we illustrate that how a patient interacts with a health system influences which data are recorded in the EHR. These interactions are typically informative, potentially resulting in bias. We term the overall set of induced biases <i>informed presence.</i> To illustrate this, we use examples from EHR based analyses. Specifically, we show that: 1) Where a patient receives services within a health facility can induce <i>selection bias;</i> 2) Which health system a patient chooses for an encounter can result in <i>information bias;</i> and 3) Referral encounters can create an <i>admixture bias.</i> While often times addressing these biases can be straightforward, it is important to understand how they are induced in any EHR based analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/4e/egems-5-1-243.PMC5994954.pdf","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) data are becoming a primary resource for clinical research. Compared to traditional research data, such as those from clinical trials and epidemiologic cohorts, EHR data have a number of appealing characteristics. However, because they do not have mechanisms set in place to ensure that the appropriate data are collected, they also pose a number of analytic challenges. In this paper, we illustrate that how a patient interacts with a health system influences which data are recorded in the EHR. These interactions are typically informative, potentially resulting in bias. We term the overall set of induced biases informed presence. To illustrate this, we use examples from EHR based analyses. Specifically, we show that: 1) Where a patient receives services within a health facility can induce selection bias; 2) Which health system a patient chooses for an encounter can result in information bias; and 3) Referral encounters can create an admixture bias. While often times addressing these biases can be straightforward, it is important to understand how they are induced in any EHR based analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

说明电子健康记录数据中的知情存在偏差:患者与卫生系统的互动如何影响推理。
电子健康记录(EHR)数据正在成为临床研究的主要资源。与传统的研究数据(如临床试验和流行病学队列)相比,电子病历数据具有许多吸引人的特征。然而,由于它们没有适当的机制来确保收集适当的数据,因此它们也带来了许多分析上的挑战。在本文中,我们说明了患者如何与卫生系统交互影响哪些数据记录在电子病历中。这些互动通常是信息性的,可能会导致偏见。我们把所有诱发的偏见称为知情存在。为了说明这一点,我们使用了基于电子病历分析的示例。具体而言,我们表明:1)患者在医疗机构内接受服务可能会导致选择偏差;2)患者选择就诊的卫生系统可能导致信息偏差;3)推荐接触会产生混合偏见。虽然解决这些偏差通常很简单,但重要的是要了解它们是如何在任何基于电子病历的分析中产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信