A PCR-based quantitative assay for the evaluation of mRNA integrity in rat samples

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Bhaja K. Padhi , Manjeet Singh , Marianela Rosales , Guillaume Pelletier , Sabit Cakmak
{"title":"A PCR-based quantitative assay for the evaluation of mRNA integrity in rat samples","authors":"Bhaja K. Padhi ,&nbsp;Manjeet Singh ,&nbsp;Marianela Rosales ,&nbsp;Guillaume Pelletier ,&nbsp;Sabit Cakmak","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reverse Transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is applied to quantify gene transcript levels in a wide range of investigations. Proper assessment of RNA integrity is essential for reliable assessment of gene expression levels, as RNA molecules are acutely vulnerable to degradation. However, RNA quality control measures are still infrequently reported in rat toxicological studies, which impede proper evaluation of gene expression data reliability. The high operational cost of microfluidic capillary electrophoresis systems along with paucity of alternative methods for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity constitute potential hurdles to the systematic implementation and reporting of RNA integrity assessment in rat studies. This manuscript describes the adaptation of an alternative RT-qPCR-based 3′:5′ assay as an additional option for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity. Two PCR primer sets were designed on the 3′ and 5′ regions of a rat housekeeping gene to evaluate RNA integrity by measuring the relative expression (3′:5′ ratio) of these amplicons. The 3′:5′ ratios were then compared to Agilent Bioanalyzer’s RNA integrity number (RIN) for a wide range of RNA samples originating from different tissues, cultured cell lines and rat strains that were prepared freshly, stored for years at −80 °C, purchased commercially or intentionally degraded. The 3′:5′ ratios and RIN values presented similar assessment of RNA integrity status from intact to heavily degraded samples. Based on the LOWESS regression of this large comparison dataset, 3′:5′ ratio threshold criteria equivalent to RIN cut-off values can be proposed for the selection of RNA samples for RT-qPCR analyses. This qPCR-based assay is easy to implement, cost-effective, and provides a reliable quantification of RNA integrity to assist in the selection of rat RNA samples suitable for downstream RT-qPCR gene expression analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"15 ","pages":"Pages 18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.02.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753517302176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Reverse Transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is applied to quantify gene transcript levels in a wide range of investigations. Proper assessment of RNA integrity is essential for reliable assessment of gene expression levels, as RNA molecules are acutely vulnerable to degradation. However, RNA quality control measures are still infrequently reported in rat toxicological studies, which impede proper evaluation of gene expression data reliability. The high operational cost of microfluidic capillary electrophoresis systems along with paucity of alternative methods for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity constitute potential hurdles to the systematic implementation and reporting of RNA integrity assessment in rat studies. This manuscript describes the adaptation of an alternative RT-qPCR-based 3′:5′ assay as an additional option for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity. Two PCR primer sets were designed on the 3′ and 5′ regions of a rat housekeeping gene to evaluate RNA integrity by measuring the relative expression (3′:5′ ratio) of these amplicons. The 3′:5′ ratios were then compared to Agilent Bioanalyzer’s RNA integrity number (RIN) for a wide range of RNA samples originating from different tissues, cultured cell lines and rat strains that were prepared freshly, stored for years at −80 °C, purchased commercially or intentionally degraded. The 3′:5′ ratios and RIN values presented similar assessment of RNA integrity status from intact to heavily degraded samples. Based on the LOWESS regression of this large comparison dataset, 3′:5′ ratio threshold criteria equivalent to RIN cut-off values can be proposed for the selection of RNA samples for RT-qPCR analyses. This qPCR-based assay is easy to implement, cost-effective, and provides a reliable quantification of RNA integrity to assist in the selection of rat RNA samples suitable for downstream RT-qPCR gene expression analyses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于pcr的大鼠样本mRNA完整性定量评价方法
逆转录实时定量PCR (RT-qPCR)在广泛的研究中被用于定量基因转录水平。正确评估RNA完整性对于可靠评估基因表达水平至关重要,因为RNA分子极易降解。然而,RNA质量控制措施在大鼠毒理学研究中仍然很少报道,这阻碍了对基因表达数据可靠性的适当评估。微流控毛细管电泳系统的高操作成本以及缺乏定量评估大鼠RNA完整性的替代方法,构成了在大鼠研究中系统实施和报告RNA完整性评估的潜在障碍。这篇论文描述了一种替代性的基于rt - qpcr的3 ':5 '测定的适应性,作为定量评估大鼠RNA完整性的额外选择。在一个大鼠管家基因的3′和5′区设计了两个PCR引物,通过测量这些扩增子的相对表达量(3′:5′比)来评估RNA的完整性。然后将3 ':5 '比例与安捷伦生物分析仪的RNA完整性数(RIN)进行比较,用于来自不同组织,培养细胞系和大鼠菌株的各种RNA样品,这些样品新鲜制备,在- 80 °C下保存多年,商业购买或故意降解。3 ':5 '比率和RIN值对从完整样品到严重降解样品的RNA完整性状态进行了类似的评估。基于该大型比较数据集的LOWESS回归,可以提出相当于RIN截止值的3 ':5 '比例阈值标准,用于RT-qPCR分析RNA样本的选择。这种基于qpcr的分析易于实施,成本效益高,并提供可靠的RNA完整性定量,以帮助选择适合下游RT-qPCR基因表达分析的大鼠RNA样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信