Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration.

Eric A Woodcock, Muzamil Arshad, Dalal Khatib, Jeffrey A Stanley
{"title":"Automated Voxel Placement: A Linux-based Suite of Tools for Accurate and Reliable Single Voxel Coregistration.","authors":"Eric A Woodcock,&nbsp;Muzamil Arshad,&nbsp;Dalal Khatib,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Stanley","doi":"10.17756/jnpn.2018-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H MRS) is a powerful technique for studying <i>in vivo</i> neurochemistry, but has an often-overlooked source of error variance: inconsistent voxel placement between scans. We developed and evaluated an Automated Voxel Placement (AVP) procedure for accurate and reliable <sup>1</sup>H MRS voxel prescription. AVP is a suite of Linux-based programs that facilitate automated template-driven single-voxel coregistration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three studies were conducted to evaluate AVP for prescription of one voxel: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. First, we evaluated how robust AVP was to 'extreme' subject head positions/angulations within the scanner head coil. Second, subjects (N = 13) were recruited and underwent MR scans. Manual voxel prescription (n = 5) was contrasted with AVP (n = 8). A subset of AVP subjects (n = 4) completed a second scan. Third, ongoing data collection (n = 16; recruited for a separate study) helped evaluate AVP. Voxel placement accuracy was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage between each subject's voxel and the template voxel. Reliability was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage across subjects at each time point and within subjects who completed two scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated that AVP was robust to 'extreme' head positions (97.5% - 97.9% overlap with the template voxel). AVP was significantly more accurate (baseline and follow-up: 96.2% ± 3.0% and 97.6% ± 1.4% overlap) than manual voxel placement (67.7% ± 22.8% overlap; <i>p</i>s<.05). AVP was reliable within- (97.9%) and between-subjects (94.2% and 97.2% overlap; baseline and follow-up; respectively). Finally, ongoing data collection indicates AVP is accurate (96.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These pilot studies demonstrated that AVP was feasible, accurate, and reliable method for automated single voxel coregistration.</p>","PeriodicalId":91910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998677/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/jnpn.2018-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) is a powerful technique for studying in vivo neurochemistry, but has an often-overlooked source of error variance: inconsistent voxel placement between scans. We developed and evaluated an Automated Voxel Placement (AVP) procedure for accurate and reliable 1H MRS voxel prescription. AVP is a suite of Linux-based programs that facilitate automated template-driven single-voxel coregistration.

Methods: Three studies were conducted to evaluate AVP for prescription of one voxel: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. First, we evaluated how robust AVP was to 'extreme' subject head positions/angulations within the scanner head coil. Second, subjects (N = 13) were recruited and underwent MR scans. Manual voxel prescription (n = 5) was contrasted with AVP (n = 8). A subset of AVP subjects (n = 4) completed a second scan. Third, ongoing data collection (n = 16; recruited for a separate study) helped evaluate AVP. Voxel placement accuracy was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage between each subject's voxel and the template voxel. Reliability was quantified as 3D geometric voxel overlap percentage across subjects at each time point and within subjects who completed two scans.

Results: Results demonstrated that AVP was robust to 'extreme' head positions (97.5% - 97.9% overlap with the template voxel). AVP was significantly more accurate (baseline and follow-up: 96.2% ± 3.0% and 97.6% ± 1.4% overlap) than manual voxel placement (67.7% ± 22.8% overlap; ps<.05). AVP was reliable within- (97.9%) and between-subjects (94.2% and 97.2% overlap; baseline and follow-up; respectively). Finally, ongoing data collection indicates AVP is accurate (96.0%).

Conclusion: These pilot studies demonstrated that AVP was feasible, accurate, and reliable method for automated single voxel coregistration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自动体素放置:一套基于linux的工具,用于准确可靠的单体素共配准。
背景:单体素质子磁共振波谱(1H MRS)是一种研究体内神经化学的强大技术,但有一个经常被忽视的误差方差来源:扫描之间体素位置不一致。我们开发并评估了一种自动体素放置(AVP)程序,用于准确可靠的1H MRS体素处方。AVP是一套基于linux的程序,可促进自动化模板驱动的单体素共配准。方法:通过3项研究对左背外侧前额皮质单体素处方的AVP进行评价。首先,我们评估了AVP对扫描仪头线圈内受试者头部位置/角度的“极端”鲁棒性。其次,招募受试者(N = 13)并进行磁共振扫描。手动体素处方(n = 5)与AVP (n = 8)进行对比。AVP受试者子集(n = 4)完成了第二次扫描。第三,正在进行的数据收集(n = 16;参与另一项研究)有助于评估AVP。体素放置精度量化为每个受试者体素与模板体素之间的三维几何体素重叠百分比。可靠性被量化为在每个时间点和完成两次扫描的受试者之间的3D几何体素重叠百分比。结果:结果表明,AVP对“极端”头部位置(与模板体素重叠97.5% - 97.9%)具有鲁棒性。AVP的准确性(基线和随访:96.2%±3.0%和97.6%±1.4%重叠)明显高于手动体素放置(67.7%±22.8%重叠);结论:AVP是一种可行、准确、可靠的单体素自动配准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信