The Effect of Surgical Approach on Strength and Function after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Delaware medical journal Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Joseph Zeni, Kathleen Madara, James Rubano
{"title":"The Effect of Surgical Approach on Strength and Function after Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Joseph Zeni,&nbsp;Kathleen Madara,&nbsp;James Rubano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":75779,"journal":{"name":"Delaware medical journal","volume":"88 11","pages":"334-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA.

Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up.

Methods: 63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points.

Results: There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year.

Conclusion: The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.

手术入路对全髋关节置换术后肌力和功能的影响。
背景:尽管全髋关节置换术(THA)已成为治疗终末期骨关节炎(OA)症状的标准手术,但仍有多种手术入路可进入髋关节。迄今为止,关于手术入路对THA后肌肉力量和基于性能的功能能力测量的影响的信息有限。问题/目的:本研究的目的是比较后路或前外侧手术入路对THA术后力量和功能的影响。我们假设术后一年接受后路入路的个体比接受前外侧入路的个体有更大的力量和基于性能的功能测量。我们还假设在随访中疼痛或自我报告的结果没有差异。方法:63例患者分别于THA术前2 ~ 4周及THA术后3个月、12个月进行检测。受试者分为后路入路组和外侧入路组。患者在每个时间点完成功能测试、强度测量和自我报告问卷。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)检验来检验术前和1年时间点之间的变化。报告了所有三个时间点的描述性数据。结果:髋外展力与髋外展力有显著交互作用(p=0.025),外侧组髋外展力与髋外展力有显著交互作用(p=0.018)。其他变量均未表现出显著的交互作用;然而,除髋关节外展肌力量(p=0.883)和非手术侧疼痛(p=0.527)外,所有其他变量均显示时间的主要影响(p≤0.01),其中1年有显著改善。结论:髋关节置换术后1年外侧入路髋外展较弱;然而,大多数受试者的功能能力得到了显著的、有临床意义的改善。不管手术方式如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信