Hill–Sachs lesion measurement with tridimensional models in anterior shoulder instability

Alberto Naoki Miyazaki, Luciana Andrade Silva, Pedro Doneux Santos, Guilherme do Val Sella, Leonardo Hideto Nagaya, Sergio Luiz Checchia
{"title":"Hill–Sachs lesion measurement with tridimensional models in anterior shoulder instability","authors":"Alberto Naoki Miyazaki,&nbsp;Luciana Andrade Silva,&nbsp;Pedro Doneux Santos,&nbsp;Guilherme do Val Sella,&nbsp;Leonardo Hideto Nagaya,&nbsp;Sergio Luiz Checchia","doi":"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0® software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0® software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101095,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","volume":"53 3","pages":"Pages 357-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype.

Methods

Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0® software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0® software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software.

Results

There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (p < 0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肩前路不稳的Hill-Sachs损伤三维模型测量
目的利用计算机软件和三维模型,评价ct图像对Hill-Sachs病变测量的再现性和可重复性。方法采用InVesalius 3.0®软件对14例前路肩关节不稳患者的计算机断层图像进行三维建模。使用Rhinocerus 5.0®软件测量Hill-Sachs病变,并预先确定位置。测量中外侧距离,垂直于肱骨干,颅尾距离,平行于肱骨干,以及病变的纵向距离。利用printer - zp310三维打印机制作石膏模型。为了测量Hill-Sachs病变,采用与软件相同的方法校准通用数字卡尺。结果同一模型的测量存在观察者内部和观察者之间的变异。观测者没有以类似的方式进行测量,这表明使用该方法很困难(p <0.05)。使用软件测量中侧向距离,以及在用卡尺测量时,模型类型影响了每个观测者的测量结果,导致该方法无效(p <0.05)。结论石膏模型与软件模型间Hill-Sachs损伤测量无重现性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信