The effectiveness of consultation for clinicians learning to deliver motivational interviewing with fidelity.

Raluca Barac, Melissa Kimber, Sabine Johnson, Melanie Barwick
{"title":"The effectiveness of consultation for clinicians learning to deliver motivational interviewing with fidelity.","authors":"Raluca Barac,&nbsp;Melissa Kimber,&nbsp;Sabine Johnson,&nbsp;Melanie Barwick","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1480988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the emerging literature documenting gains in clinician competence following consultation, little empirical work has examined consultation as an implementation strategy. To this end, the present study examined consultation in the context of implementing motivational interviewing in four community child and youth mental health organizations. We used qualitative methods with a dual goal: to describe the consultation process and to explore trainees' perspectives on consultation. Participants included 22 clinicians and 9 supervisors who received monthly, group, phone-based consultation for seven months following training in motivational interviewing. Analyses showed that consultation was perceived as effective because it helped to \"keep motivational interviewing alive,\" fulfilled a profound learning function through collaboration and connection with others, and served as protected time for reflection on practice change. Our findings contribute to a body of knowledge about consultation elements that appear to be effective when implementing research-supported interventions in child and youth mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 5","pages":"510-533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1480988","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1480988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Despite the emerging literature documenting gains in clinician competence following consultation, little empirical work has examined consultation as an implementation strategy. To this end, the present study examined consultation in the context of implementing motivational interviewing in four community child and youth mental health organizations. We used qualitative methods with a dual goal: to describe the consultation process and to explore trainees' perspectives on consultation. Participants included 22 clinicians and 9 supervisors who received monthly, group, phone-based consultation for seven months following training in motivational interviewing. Analyses showed that consultation was perceived as effective because it helped to "keep motivational interviewing alive," fulfilled a profound learning function through collaboration and connection with others, and served as protected time for reflection on practice change. Our findings contribute to a body of knowledge about consultation elements that appear to be effective when implementing research-supported interventions in child and youth mental health.

临床医生学习提供忠诚的动机性访谈的咨询效果。
尽管越来越多的文献记录了咨询后临床医生能力的提高,但很少有实证研究将咨询作为一种实施策略。为此目的,本研究在四个社区儿童和青少年心理健康组织实施动机性访谈的背景下审查咨询。我们使用定性方法有两个目标:描述咨询过程和探索学员对咨询的看法。参与者包括22名临床医生和9名主管,他们在接受动机性访谈培训后,每月接受一次小组电话咨询,为期7个月。分析表明,咨询被认为是有效的,因为它有助于“保持动机性访谈的活力”,通过与他人的合作和联系实现了深刻的学习功能,并作为反思实践变化的保护时间。我们的研究结果有助于形成关于咨询要素的知识体系,这些要素在实施研究支持的儿童和青少年心理健康干预措施时似乎是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信