AF Classification from a Short Single Lead ECG Recording: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2017.

Computing in cardiology Pub Date : 2017-09-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-05 DOI:10.22489/CinC.2017.065-469
Gari D Clifford, Chengyu Liu, Benjamin Moody, Li-Wei H Lehman, Ikaro Silva, Qiao Li, A E Johnson, Roger G Mark
{"title":"AF Classification from a Short Single Lead ECG Recording: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2017.","authors":"Gari D Clifford,&nbsp;Chengyu Liu,&nbsp;Benjamin Moody,&nbsp;Li-Wei H Lehman,&nbsp;Ikaro Silva,&nbsp;Qiao Li,&nbsp;A E Johnson,&nbsp;Roger G Mark","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2017.065-469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology (CinC) Challenge 2017 focused on differentiating AF from noise, normal or other rhythms in short term (from 9-61 s) ECG recordings performed by patients. A total of 12,186 ECGs were used: 8,528 in the public training set and 3,658 in the private hidden test set. Due to the high degree of inter-expert disagreement between a significant fraction of the expert labels we implemented a mid-competition bootstrap approach to expert relabeling of the data, levering the best performing Challenge entrants' algorithms to identify contentious labels. A total of 75 independent teams entered the Challenge using a variety of traditional and novel methods, ranging from random forests to a deep learning approach applied to the raw data in the spectral domain. Four teams won the Challenge with an equal high F1 score (averaged across all classes) of 0.83, although the top 11 algorithms scored within 2% of this. A combination of 45 algorithms identified using LASSO achieved an F1 of 0.87, indicating that a voting approach can boost performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"44 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.22489/CinC.2017.065-469","citationCount":"555","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2017.065-469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 555

Abstract

The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology (CinC) Challenge 2017 focused on differentiating AF from noise, normal or other rhythms in short term (from 9-61 s) ECG recordings performed by patients. A total of 12,186 ECGs were used: 8,528 in the public training set and 3,658 in the private hidden test set. Due to the high degree of inter-expert disagreement between a significant fraction of the expert labels we implemented a mid-competition bootstrap approach to expert relabeling of the data, levering the best performing Challenge entrants' algorithms to identify contentious labels. A total of 75 independent teams entered the Challenge using a variety of traditional and novel methods, ranging from random forests to a deep learning approach applied to the raw data in the spectral domain. Four teams won the Challenge with an equal high F1 score (averaged across all classes) of 0.83, although the top 11 algorithms scored within 2% of this. A combination of 45 algorithms identified using LASSO achieved an F1 of 0.87, indicating that a voting approach can boost performance.

Abstract Image

从短单导联心电图记录中进行心房颤动分类:2017年生理学/心脏病学计算挑战赛。
2017年PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology (CinC)挑战赛的重点是在患者进行的短期(9-61秒)ECG记录中区分AF与噪音、正常或其他节律。总共使用了12186个心电图:8528个在公共训练集,3658个在私有隐藏测试集。由于很大一部分专家标签之间存在高度的专家间分歧,我们实施了一种中期引导方法来对数据进行专家重新标记,利用表现最好的挑战赛参赛者的算法来识别有争议的标签。共有75个独立团队参加了挑战赛,他们使用了各种传统和新颖的方法,从随机森林到应用于光谱域原始数据的深度学习方法。四支队伍以同样高的F1分数(所有班级的平均分数)赢得了挑战赛,得分为0.83,尽管排名前11位的算法得分不到这个分数的2%。使用LASSO识别的45种算法的组合获得了0.87的F1,表明投票方法可以提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信