A Review of Outcomes and Technique for the Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer.

IF 1.8 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2018-05-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/2146080
Zeyad R Schwen, Mohit Gupta, Phillip M Pierorazio
{"title":"A Review of Outcomes and Technique for the Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer.","authors":"Zeyad R Schwen,&nbsp;Mohit Gupta,&nbsp;Phillip M Pierorazio","doi":"10.1155/2018/2146080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) represents a new frontier in the surgical management of testicular cancer in the realm of minimally invasive urologic oncology. We aimed to review the early outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches as well as describe the operative technique for the R-RPLND.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We reviewed all the literature related to the R-RPLND based on an electronic PubMed search up until July 2017.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Encouraged by favorable early oncologic and safety outcomes for treatment of clinical stage (CS) I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), the R-RPLND affords the same recovery advantages as the laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) while offering greater dexterity, superior visualization, and a theoretically shorter learning curve for the surgeon. While R-RPLND has a promising future in the management of patients with primary and postchemotherapy NSGCT, larger and more vigorous prospective studies are needed before supplanting the open RPLND as the gold standard approach for primary low-stage NSGCT or becoming an equivalent surgical modality in the postchemotherapy setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7490,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/2146080","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2146080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objectives: The robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) represents a new frontier in the surgical management of testicular cancer in the realm of minimally invasive urologic oncology. We aimed to review the early outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches as well as describe the operative technique for the R-RPLND.

Materials and methods: We reviewed all the literature related to the R-RPLND based on an electronic PubMed search up until July 2017.

Results and discussion: Encouraged by favorable early oncologic and safety outcomes for treatment of clinical stage (CS) I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), the R-RPLND affords the same recovery advantages as the laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) while offering greater dexterity, superior visualization, and a theoretically shorter learning curve for the surgeon. While R-RPLND has a promising future in the management of patients with primary and postchemotherapy NSGCT, larger and more vigorous prospective studies are needed before supplanting the open RPLND as the gold standard approach for primary low-stage NSGCT or becoming an equivalent surgical modality in the postchemotherapy setting.

机器人辅助腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫治疗睾丸癌的效果与技术综述。
目的:机器人辅助腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫(R-RPLND)是泌尿外科微创肿瘤领域睾丸癌手术治疗的新前沿。我们的目的是回顾与腹腔镜和开放入路相比的早期结果,并描述R-RPLND的手术技术。材料和方法:我们基于PubMed电子检索,回顾了截至2017年7月的所有与R-RPLND相关的文献。结果和讨论:由于临床分期(CS) I期非半胱氨酸生殖细胞肿瘤(NSGCT)治疗的早期肿瘤学和安全性良好,R-RPLND与腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫(L-RPLND)具有相同的恢复优势,同时为外科医生提供了更大的灵活性、更好的可视化和理论上更短的学习曲线。虽然R-RPLND在原发性和化疗后NSGCT患者的治疗中有很好的前景,但在取代开放式RPLND作为原发性低期NSGCT的金标准方法或成为化疗后同等的手术方式之前,还需要更大规模、更有力的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Urology
Advances in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Urology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes state-of-the-art reviews and original research papers of wide interest in all fields of urology. The journal strives to provide publication of important manuscripts to the widest possible audience worldwide, without the constraints of expensive, hard-to-access, traditional bound journals. Advances in Urology is designed to improve publication access of both well-established urologic scientists and less well-established writers, by allowing interested scientists worldwide to participate fully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信