Between Gloom and Transfiguration: Analysis of Petitions conducted by the Ministry of Health of the GDR as a Historical Source for the Description of the Main Problems and the Strategies to handle Problems in the GDR Health Care System

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Medizinhistorisches Journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Harmut Bettin
{"title":"Between Gloom and Transfiguration: Analysis of Petitions conducted by the Ministry of Health of the GDR as a Historical Source for the Description of the Main Problems and the Strategies to handle Problems in the GDR Health Care System","authors":"Harmut Bettin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to its outstanding political significance the GDR dedicated extraordinary attention to their health care system. By the help of analyses of petitions (complaints and hints) of the citizens conducted by the Ministry of Health of the GDR it is possible to gain a survey about the critiques and expectations in this field that were submitted to the GDR authorities. They form a comprehensive and significant source for the understanding of the GDR health care system, individual and social values as well as institutional reactions and strategies to handle problems. Surprisingly, critiques about the behaviour of the medical staff ranked almost equally to complaints about material deficits. Based on an elaborate system of evaluation these petitions served as an instrument of citizens of \"direct democracy\" that caused critical reflection of the government and influenced its perception and action. On the other hand the critique concerning the health care system individualized the protests, prevented a collective movement and generally only caused corrections of details.</p>","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"51 4","pages":"327-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to its outstanding political significance the GDR dedicated extraordinary attention to their health care system. By the help of analyses of petitions (complaints and hints) of the citizens conducted by the Ministry of Health of the GDR it is possible to gain a survey about the critiques and expectations in this field that were submitted to the GDR authorities. They form a comprehensive and significant source for the understanding of the GDR health care system, individual and social values as well as institutional reactions and strategies to handle problems. Surprisingly, critiques about the behaviour of the medical staff ranked almost equally to complaints about material deficits. Based on an elaborate system of evaluation these petitions served as an instrument of citizens of "direct democracy" that caused critical reflection of the government and influenced its perception and action. On the other hand the critique concerning the health care system individualized the protests, prevented a collective movement and generally only caused corrections of details.

在黑暗与变形之间:德意志民主共和国卫生部作为描述德意志民主共和国卫生保健系统主要问题和处理问题策略的历史来源的请愿分析
由于其突出的政治意义,民主德国对其医疗保健系统给予了极大的关注。在德意志民主共和国卫生部对公民请愿(投诉和暗示)进行分析的帮助下,有可能对向德意志民主共和国当局提交的这一领域的批评和期望进行调查。它们是了解德意志民主共和国卫生保健系统、个人和社会价值以及处理问题的机构反应和策略的全面和重要来源。令人惊讶的是,对医务人员行为的批评几乎与对物质赤字的抱怨并列。基于一套复杂的评估体系,这些请愿书成为公民“直接民主”的工具,引发了对政府的批判性反思,影响了政府的看法和行动。另一方面,对医疗保健系统的批评使抗议活动个人化,阻止了集体运动,通常只导致了细节的纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信