Intralesional cryotherapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2017-04-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513117702162
Ciaran P O'Boyle, Holleh Shayan-Arani, Maha Wagdy Hamada
{"title":"Intralesional cryotherapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review.","authors":"Ciaran P O'Boyle, Holleh Shayan-Arani, Maha Wagdy Hamada","doi":"10.1177/2059513117702162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertrophic and keloid scarring remain notoriously troublesome for patients to tolerate and frustratingly difficult for clinicians to treat. Many different treatment modalities exist, signifying the failure of any method to achieve consistently excellent results. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively recent development that uses a double lumen needle, placed through the core of a keloid or hypertrophic scar, to deliver nitrogen vapour, which freezes the scar from its core, outwards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on intralesional cryotherapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids. A systematic review or meta-analysis was not possible, since the existing articles did not permit this.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search of English language, peer-reviewed literature was carried out. The evidence base was found to be low (level 4). In addition, much of the published evidence comes from a very few groups. Despite this, consistent findings from case series suggest that the technique is safe and achieves good scar reduction with very few treatments. Adverse effects include depigmentation, recurrence and pain. Pain and recurrence appear to be uncommon and depigmentation may be temporary.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Well-constructed, prospectively recruited comparative trials are absent from the literature. These are strongly encouraged, in order to strengthen general confidence in this technique and in the repeatability of outcomes reported thus far.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/bc/10.1177_2059513117702162.PMC5965337.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117702162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertrophic and keloid scarring remain notoriously troublesome for patients to tolerate and frustratingly difficult for clinicians to treat. Many different treatment modalities exist, signifying the failure of any method to achieve consistently excellent results. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively recent development that uses a double lumen needle, placed through the core of a keloid or hypertrophic scar, to deliver nitrogen vapour, which freezes the scar from its core, outwards.

Methods: This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on intralesional cryotherapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids. A systematic review or meta-analysis was not possible, since the existing articles did not permit this.

Results: A search of English language, peer-reviewed literature was carried out. The evidence base was found to be low (level 4). In addition, much of the published evidence comes from a very few groups. Despite this, consistent findings from case series suggest that the technique is safe and achieves good scar reduction with very few treatments. Adverse effects include depigmentation, recurrence and pain. Pain and recurrence appear to be uncommon and depigmentation may be temporary.

Discussion: Well-constructed, prospectively recruited comparative trials are absent from the literature. These are strongly encouraged, in order to strengthen general confidence in this technique and in the repeatability of outcomes reported thus far.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

针对增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩的区域内冷冻疗法:综述。
导言:肥大性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩一直是患者难以忍受和临床医生难以治疗的难题。目前有许多不同的治疗方法,但没有任何一种方法能始终取得卓越的疗效。瘢痕内冷冻疗法是最近发展起来的一种治疗方法,它使用双腔针头穿过瘢痕或增生性瘢痕的核心,向外输送氮气蒸汽,使瘢痕从核心向外冻结:本文对增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩内部冷冻疗法的文献进行了全面综述。由于现有文章不允许进行系统综述或荟萃分析,因此无法进行系统综述或荟萃分析:对同行评审的英文文献进行了检索。发现证据基础较低(4 级)。此外,已发表的证据大多来自极少数团体。尽管如此,系列病例的一致研究结果表明,该技术是安全的,只需很少的治疗次数就能很好地减少疤痕。不良反应包括脱色、复发和疼痛。疼痛和复发似乎并不常见,色素沉着可能是暂时的:讨论:文献中缺乏结构合理、前瞻性招募的比较试验。我们强烈鼓励进行此类试验,以增强人们对这项技术的普遍信心,以及对迄今为止所报告结果的可重复性的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信