Brachytherapy in the adjuvant management of keloid scars: literature review.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2017-11-10 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513117735483
Ioannis Goutos, Rei Ogawa
{"title":"Brachytherapy in the adjuvant management of keloid scars: literature review.","authors":"Ioannis Goutos, Rei Ogawa","doi":"10.1177/2059513117735483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiation therapy is a well-recognised modality for the adjuvant treatment of keloid scars. It can be conventionally delivered as external beam using a large apparatus at a distance from the lesion or as brachytherapy with specialised equipment to enable the delivery of treatment in the immediate vicinity of the keloidal tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An English literature review was performed with keywords 'brachytherapy' and 'keloid' using the databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their individual dates of inception until June 2017. Studies pertinent to the field are presented in a chronological manner to depict the evolution of different brachytherapy strategies over the last decades. We also discuss considerations relating to the risk of secondary carcinogenesis, which are relevant to shared decision-making in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy was first introduced in the English literature in 1976 and currently appears to have been superseded by more modern approaches, including high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy. This modality compares favourably to more traditional modes of radiotherapy in terms of recurrence as well as rates of symptomatic relief from keloidal symptoms. Superficial brachytherapy was introduced more recently in the relevant literature and appears to be associated with favourable therapeutic outcomes compared to external beam radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brachytherapy is a valid modality of radiotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of keloid scars, with high dose rate interstitial and surface regimens gaining in popularity over recent years. Further research needs to focus on randomised controlled trials to further establish the role of different radiotherapy modalities in keloid scar management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2059513117735483","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117735483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Introduction: Radiation therapy is a well-recognised modality for the adjuvant treatment of keloid scars. It can be conventionally delivered as external beam using a large apparatus at a distance from the lesion or as brachytherapy with specialised equipment to enable the delivery of treatment in the immediate vicinity of the keloidal tissue.

Methods: An English literature review was performed with keywords 'brachytherapy' and 'keloid' using the databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their individual dates of inception until June 2017. Studies pertinent to the field are presented in a chronological manner to depict the evolution of different brachytherapy strategies over the last decades. We also discuss considerations relating to the risk of secondary carcinogenesis, which are relevant to shared decision-making in the clinical setting.

Discussion: Low dose rate interstitial brachytherapy was first introduced in the English literature in 1976 and currently appears to have been superseded by more modern approaches, including high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy. This modality compares favourably to more traditional modes of radiotherapy in terms of recurrence as well as rates of symptomatic relief from keloidal symptoms. Superficial brachytherapy was introduced more recently in the relevant literature and appears to be associated with favourable therapeutic outcomes compared to external beam radiation therapy.

Conclusion: Brachytherapy is a valid modality of radiotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of keloid scars, with high dose rate interstitial and surface regimens gaining in popularity over recent years. Further research needs to focus on randomised controlled trials to further establish the role of different radiotherapy modalities in keloid scar management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

近距离放疗辅助治疗瘢痕疙瘩:文献综述。
导读:放射治疗是一种公认的辅助治疗瘢痕疙瘩的方法。它可以传统地作为外部光束使用大型设备在远离病变的距离或作为近距离治疗与专门的设备,以使在瘢痕组织附近提供治疗。方法:使用PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库,从各自的成立日期到2017年6月,以“近距离治疗”和“瘢痕瘤”为关键词进行英文文献综述。有关该领域的研究以时间顺序的方式呈现,以描述过去几十年来不同近距离治疗策略的演变。我们还讨论了与继发性致癌风险相关的考虑因素,这与临床环境中的共同决策有关。讨论:低剂量率间质性近距离放射治疗于1976年首次在英国文献中被介绍,目前似乎已被更现代的方法所取代,包括高剂量率间质性近距离放射治疗。在复发率和瘢痕样症状缓解率方面,这种方式比更传统的放疗方式更有利。最近在相关文献中引入了浅表近距离放射治疗,与外部放射治疗相比,浅表近距离放射治疗似乎具有良好的治疗效果。结论:近距离放疗是一种有效的辅助治疗瘢痕疙瘩的放疗方式,近年来高剂量率的间隙和表面放疗方案越来越受欢迎。进一步的研究需要集中在随机对照试验上,以进一步确定不同的放疗方式在瘢痕疙瘩治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信