Moral distress and burnout among cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit healthcare professionals: A prospective cross-sectional survey.

Leah Johnson-Coyle, Dawn Opgenorth, Mandy Bellows, Jasdip Dhaliwal, Sydney Richardson-Carr, Sean M Bagshaw
{"title":"Moral distress and burnout among cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit healthcare professionals: A prospective cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Leah Johnson-Coyle,&nbsp;Dawn Opgenorth,&nbsp;Mandy Bellows,&nbsp;Jasdip Dhaliwal,&nbsp;Sydney Richardson-Carr,&nbsp;Sean M Bagshaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intensive care unit (IGU) is a busy, high stress, complex environment in which health care professionals routinely provide numerous forms of advanced life support and life sustaining measures to a wide mix of critically ill patients. Frontline ICU professionals directly involved in patient care may be subjected to considerable psychosocial stressors and be susceptible to moral distress and burnout.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe and compare the prevalence and contributing factors to moral distress and burnout among ICUprofessionals in a large quaternary cardiovascular surgery ICU (CVICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web-based survey of ICU professionals (registered nurses [RN]/nurse practitioners [NP]; registered respiratory therapists [RRT]; allied health [AH] and physicians [MD]) working in a 24-bed CVICU at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, between June 15-29, 2015. The survey captured sociodemographic data and integrated the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, the Maslach Burnout Inventory', and a validated job satisfaction questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>One hundred sixty-nine providers completed the sur- vey (response rate 88%). The majority of respondents were aged 26-34 years old (45%), female (79%), married or common law (50%), full-time employed (78%) and had been working in the CVICU for >5 years (46%). Moral distress scores were highest among RN/NP (med [IQR] 80 [57-110]) and RRT (85 [61-104]) compared to AH (54 [39-66]) and physicians (66 [43-82], p=0.05). The highest-ranked sources of moral distress were related to controversies on end-of-life care (\"Continue to participate in the care for a hopelessly ill person who is being sustained on a ventilator, when no one will make a decision to withdrawal support\") and poor communication (\"witness healthcare providers giving false hope' to a patient or family\"). High, moderate and low levels of burnout syndrome were found in 64.0%, 22.7% and 13.3% of respondents with significantly greater levels among non-physician professionals (p<0.001). Job satisfaction was highest for physicians compared with other professionals (p<0.001). The item \"the recognition you get for good work\" was consistently rated as poor across all groups. Moral distress and burnout scores were positively correlated (p<0. 001), whereas both were neg- atively correlated with job satisfaction (p<0.001 for both). This was primarily driven by RN/NP scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moral distress and burnout are common in health- care professionals in a large academic cardiovascular surgery ICU, in particular among nurses and respiratory therapists. Both moral distress and burnout have a negative perception on job satisfaction. These findings will direct strategies to mitigate moral distress and burnout along with enhancing patient care and improving the workplace environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"27 4","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intensive care unit (IGU) is a busy, high stress, complex environment in which health care professionals routinely provide numerous forms of advanced life support and life sustaining measures to a wide mix of critically ill patients. Frontline ICU professionals directly involved in patient care may be subjected to considerable psychosocial stressors and be susceptible to moral distress and burnout.

Purpose: To describe and compare the prevalence and contributing factors to moral distress and burnout among ICUprofessionals in a large quaternary cardiovascular surgery ICU (CVICU).

Methods: Web-based survey of ICU professionals (registered nurses [RN]/nurse practitioners [NP]; registered respiratory therapists [RRT]; allied health [AH] and physicians [MD]) working in a 24-bed CVICU at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, between June 15-29, 2015. The survey captured sociodemographic data and integrated the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, the Maslach Burnout Inventory', and a validated job satisfaction questionnaire.

Findings: One hundred sixty-nine providers completed the sur- vey (response rate 88%). The majority of respondents were aged 26-34 years old (45%), female (79%), married or common law (50%), full-time employed (78%) and had been working in the CVICU for >5 years (46%). Moral distress scores were highest among RN/NP (med [IQR] 80 [57-110]) and RRT (85 [61-104]) compared to AH (54 [39-66]) and physicians (66 [43-82], p=0.05). The highest-ranked sources of moral distress were related to controversies on end-of-life care ("Continue to participate in the care for a hopelessly ill person who is being sustained on a ventilator, when no one will make a decision to withdrawal support") and poor communication ("witness healthcare providers giving false hope' to a patient or family"). High, moderate and low levels of burnout syndrome were found in 64.0%, 22.7% and 13.3% of respondents with significantly greater levels among non-physician professionals (p<0.001). Job satisfaction was highest for physicians compared with other professionals (p<0.001). The item "the recognition you get for good work" was consistently rated as poor across all groups. Moral distress and burnout scores were positively correlated (p<0. 001), whereas both were neg- atively correlated with job satisfaction (p<0.001 for both). This was primarily driven by RN/NP scores.

Conclusion: Moral distress and burnout are common in health- care professionals in a large academic cardiovascular surgery ICU, in particular among nurses and respiratory therapists. Both moral distress and burnout have a negative perception on job satisfaction. These findings will direct strategies to mitigate moral distress and burnout along with enhancing patient care and improving the workplace environment.

心血管外科重症监护病房医护人员的道德困扰和职业倦怠:一项前瞻性横断面调查。
背景:重症监护室(IGU)是一个繁忙、高压力、复杂的环境,在这里,卫生保健专业人员经常为各种各样的危重病人提供各种形式的高级生命支持和生命维持措施。直接参与病人护理的一线ICU专业人员可能会受到相当大的社会心理压力,并容易受到道德困扰和倦怠。目的:描述并比较某大型四级心血管外科ICU (CVICU) ICU专业人员道德困扰和职业倦怠的患病率及其影响因素。方法:对ICU专业人员(注册护士[RN]/执业护士[NP])进行网络调查;注册呼吸治疗师;联合健康[AH]和内科医生[MD])于2015年6月15日至29日在马赞科夫斯基阿尔伯塔心脏研究所24张床位的CVICU工作。该调查收集了社会人口统计数据,并整合了道德困扰量表(修订版)、马斯拉奇倦怠量表(Maslach Burnout Inventory)和一份经过验证的工作满意度问卷。调查结果:169家供应商完成了调查(回复率88%)。大多数受访者年龄在26-34岁之间(45%),女性(79%),已婚或普通法(50%),全职工作(78%),在CVICU工作超过5年(46%)。护士/NP (med [IQR] 80[57-110])和RRT(85[61-104])的道德困扰评分最高,AH(54[39-66])和内科医生(66 [43-82],p=0.05)。排名最高的道德困扰来源与临终关怀的争议有关(“在没有人会决定撤回支持的情况下,继续参与对无望的病人的护理”)和沟通不良(“目睹医疗保健提供者给病人或家属虚假的希望”)。64.0%、22.7%和13.3%的受访者存在高、中、低水平的倦怠综合征,其中非医师专业人员的水平更高(结论:道德困扰和倦怠在大型学术心血管外科ICU的卫生保健专业人员中很常见,尤其是护士和呼吸治疗师。道德窘迫和职业倦怠对工作满意度均有负向影响。这些发现将指导减轻道德困扰和倦怠的策略,同时加强病人护理和改善工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信