Determination of Bilateral Symmetry of Carotid Artery Structure and Function in Children and Adolescents.

Journal of vascular diagnostics and interventions Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-13 DOI:10.2147/JVD.S123063

Katelyn E Uithoven, Justin R Ryder, Roland Brown, Kyle D Rudser, Nicholas G Evanoff, Donald R Dengel, Aaron S Kelly

{"title":"Determination of Bilateral Symmetry of Carotid Artery Structure and Function in Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Katelyn E Uithoven, Justin R Ryder, Roland Brown, Kyle D Rudser, Nicholas G Evanoff, Donald R Dengel, Aaron S Kelly","doi":"10.2147/JVD.S123063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the symmetry of carotid arteries in youth with high-resolution ultrasound. Participants (n=230 (121 females),13.8 ± 2.9 years old) were assessed for: intima media thickness (cIMT), lumen diameter (cLD), incremental elastic modulus (cIEM), diameter compliance (cDC), cross-sectional compliance (cCSC), diameter distensibility (cDD), and cross-sectional distensibility (cCSD). No significant differences (P >0.05 all) were found for cIMT (0.49 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.49 ± 0.08 mm), cIEM (1095 ± 382 mmHg vs. 1116 ± 346mmHg), cDC (0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg), cCSC (0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg), cDD (14.0 ± 3.16% vs. 13.7 ± 3.18%), and cCSD (30.1 ± 7.37% vs. 29.4 ± 7.36%). Significant differences were found for cLD (6.06 ± 0.62 mm vs. 6.33 ± 0.64 mm, P <0.001). These data suggest that these values may be used interchangeably if one side is inaccessible.","PeriodicalId":92421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular diagnostics and interventions","volume":"5 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5948187/pdf/nihms962306.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular diagnostics and interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JVD.S123063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the symmetry of carotid arteries in youth with high-resolution ultrasound. Participants (n=230 (121 females),13.8 ± 2.9 years old) were assessed for: intima media thickness (cIMT), lumen diameter (cLD), incremental elastic modulus (cIEM), diameter compliance (cDC), cross-sectional compliance (cCSC), diameter distensibility (cDD), and cross-sectional distensibility (cCSD). No significant differences (P >0.05 all) were found for cIMT (0.49 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.49 ± 0.08 mm), cIEM (1095 ± 382 mmHg vs. 1116 ± 346mmHg), cDC (0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg), cCSC (0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg), cDD (14.0 ± 3.16% vs. 13.7 ± 3.18%), and cCSD (30.1 ± 7.37% vs. 29.4 ± 7.36%). Significant differences were found for cLD (6.06 ± 0.62 mm vs. 6.33 ± 0.64 mm, P <0.001). These data suggest that these values may be used interchangeably if one side is inaccessible.

查看原文本刊更多论文

确定儿童和青少年颈动脉结构和功能的双侧对称性。

我们利用高分辨率超声波对青少年颈动脉的对称性进行了比较。我们对参与者（n=230（121 名女性），13.8 ± 2.9 岁）进行了以下评估：内膜厚度（cIMT）、管腔直径（cLD）、增量弹性模量（cIEM）、直径顺应性（cDC）、横截面顺应性（cCSC）、直径可扩张性（cDD）和横截面可扩张性（cCSD）。在 cIMT（0.49 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.49 ± 0.08 mm）、cIEM（1095 ± 382 mmHg vs. 1116 ± 346mmHg）、cDC（0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.0 mm/mmHg）、cCSC（0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg vs. 0.01 ± 0.001/mmHg）、cDD（14.0 ± 3.16% vs. 13.7 ± 3.18%）和 cCSD（30.1 ± 7.37% vs. 29.4 ± 7.36%）。发现 cLD（6.06 ± 0.62 mm vs. 6.33 ± 0.64 mm，P

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of vascular diagnostics and interventions

自引率

0.00%

发文量