Rehabilitation, Education, and the Integration of Individuals with Severe Brain Injury into Civil Society: Towards an Expanded Rights Agenda in Response to New Insights from Translational Neuroethics and Neuroscience.
{"title":"Rehabilitation, Education, and the Integration of Individuals with Severe Brain Injury into Civil Society: Towards an Expanded Rights Agenda in Response to New Insights from Translational Neuroethics and Neuroscience.","authors":"Megan S Wright, Joseph J Fins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many minimally conscious patients are segregated in nursing\nhomes, and are without access to rehabilitative technologies that could\nhelp them reintegrate into their communities. In this Article, we argue that\npersons in a minimally conscious state or who have the potential to\nprogress to such a state must be provided rehabilitative services instead of\nbeing isolated in custodial care. The right to rehabilitative technologies\nfor the injured brain stems by analogy to the expectation of free public\neducation for children and adolescents, and also by statute under the\nAmericans with Disabilities Act and under Supreme Court jurisprudence,\nnamely the leading deinstitutionalization case, Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel.\nZimring.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"16 2","pages":"233-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many minimally conscious patients are segregated in nursing
homes, and are without access to rehabilitative technologies that could
help them reintegrate into their communities. In this Article, we argue that
persons in a minimally conscious state or who have the potential to
progress to such a state must be provided rehabilitative services instead of
being isolated in custodial care. The right to rehabilitative technologies
for the injured brain stems by analogy to the expectation of free public
education for children and adolescents, and also by statute under the
Americans with Disabilities Act and under Supreme Court jurisprudence,
namely the leading deinstitutionalization case, Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel.
Zimring.
许多意识最低的病人被隔离在疗养院,无法获得帮助他们重新融入社区的康复技术。在这篇文章中,我们认为处于最低意识状态或有可能发展到这种状态的人必须提供康复服务,而不是被隔离在监护中。通过对儿童和青少年免费公共教育的期望,以及《美国残疾人法案》和最高法院判例,即著名的去机构化案件Olmstead v. L.C. ex rell . zimring,来类比受伤的脑干获得康复技术的权利。