Rehabilitation, Education, and the Integration of Individuals with Severe Brain Injury into Civil Society: Towards an Expanded Rights Agenda in Response to New Insights from Translational Neuroethics and Neuroscience.

Megan S Wright, Joseph J Fins
{"title":"Rehabilitation, Education, and the Integration of Individuals with Severe Brain Injury into Civil Society: Towards an Expanded Rights Agenda in Response to New Insights from Translational Neuroethics and Neuroscience.","authors":"Megan S Wright,&nbsp;Joseph J Fins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many minimally conscious patients are segregated in nursing\nhomes, and are without access to rehabilitative technologies that could\nhelp them reintegrate into their communities. In this Article, we argue that\npersons in a minimally conscious state or who have the potential to\nprogress to such a state must be provided rehabilitative services instead of\nbeing isolated in custodial care. The right to rehabilitative technologies\nfor the injured brain stems by analogy to the expectation of free public\neducation for children and adolescents, and also by statute under the\nAmericans with Disabilities Act and under Supreme Court jurisprudence,\nnamely the leading deinstitutionalization case, Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel.\nZimring.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"16 2","pages":"233-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many minimally conscious patients are segregated in nursing homes, and are without access to rehabilitative technologies that could help them reintegrate into their communities. In this Article, we argue that persons in a minimally conscious state or who have the potential to progress to such a state must be provided rehabilitative services instead of being isolated in custodial care. The right to rehabilitative technologies for the injured brain stems by analogy to the expectation of free public education for children and adolescents, and also by statute under the Americans with Disabilities Act and under Supreme Court jurisprudence, namely the leading deinstitutionalization case, Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring.

康复、教育和重度脑损伤个体融入公民社会:响应转化神经伦理学和神经科学新见解的扩展权利议程。
许多意识最低的病人被隔离在疗养院,无法获得帮助他们重新融入社区的康复技术。在这篇文章中,我们认为处于最低意识状态或有可能发展到这种状态的人必须提供康复服务,而不是被隔离在监护中。通过对儿童和青少年免费公共教育的期望,以及《美国残疾人法案》和最高法院判例,即著名的去机构化案件Olmstead v. L.C. ex rell . zimring,来类比受伤的脑干获得康复技术的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信