{"title":"Regulatory Disruption and Arbitrage in Health-Care Data Protection.","authors":"Nicolas P Terry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explains how the structure of U.S. health-care data protection\n(specifically its sectoral and downstream properties) has led to a chronically\nuneven policy environment for different types of health-care data. It examines\nclaims for health-care data protection exceptionalism and competing demands\nsuch as data liquidity. In conclusion, the article takes the position that healthcare-\ndata exceptionalism remains a valid imperative and that even current\nconcerns about data liquidity can be accommodated in an exceptional protective\nmodel. However, re-calibrating our protection of health-care data residing\noutside of the traditional health-care domain is challenging, currently even\npolitically impossible. Notwithstanding, a hybrid model is envisioned with\ndownstream HIPAA model remaining the dominant force within the health-care\ndomain, but being supplemented by targeted upstream and point-of-use\nprotections applying to health-care data in disrupted spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"17 1","pages":"143-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explains how the structure of U.S. health-care data protection
(specifically its sectoral and downstream properties) has led to a chronically
uneven policy environment for different types of health-care data. It examines
claims for health-care data protection exceptionalism and competing demands
such as data liquidity. In conclusion, the article takes the position that healthcare-
data exceptionalism remains a valid imperative and that even current
concerns about data liquidity can be accommodated in an exceptional protective
model. However, re-calibrating our protection of health-care data residing
outside of the traditional health-care domain is challenging, currently even
politically impossible. Notwithstanding, a hybrid model is envisioned with
downstream HIPAA model remaining the dominant force within the health-care
domain, but being supplemented by targeted upstream and point-of-use
protections applying to health-care data in disrupted spaces.