Regulatory Disruption and Arbitrage in Health-Care Data Protection.

Nicolas P Terry
{"title":"Regulatory Disruption and Arbitrage in Health-Care Data Protection.","authors":"Nicolas P Terry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explains how the structure of U.S. health-care data protection\n(specifically its sectoral and downstream properties) has led to a chronically\nuneven policy environment for different types of health-care data. It examines\nclaims for health-care data protection exceptionalism and competing demands\nsuch as data liquidity. In conclusion, the article takes the position that healthcare-\ndata exceptionalism remains a valid imperative and that even current\nconcerns about data liquidity can be accommodated in an exceptional protective\nmodel. However, re-calibrating our protection of health-care data residing\noutside of the traditional health-care domain is challenging, currently even\npolitically impossible. Notwithstanding, a hybrid model is envisioned with\ndownstream HIPAA model remaining the dominant force within the health-care\ndomain, but being supplemented by targeted upstream and point-of-use\nprotections applying to health-care data in disrupted spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"17 1","pages":"143-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explains how the structure of U.S. health-care data protection (specifically its sectoral and downstream properties) has led to a chronically uneven policy environment for different types of health-care data. It examines claims for health-care data protection exceptionalism and competing demands such as data liquidity. In conclusion, the article takes the position that healthcare- data exceptionalism remains a valid imperative and that even current concerns about data liquidity can be accommodated in an exceptional protective model. However, re-calibrating our protection of health-care data residing outside of the traditional health-care domain is challenging, currently even politically impossible. Notwithstanding, a hybrid model is envisioned with downstream HIPAA model remaining the dominant force within the health-care domain, but being supplemented by targeted upstream and point-of-use protections applying to health-care data in disrupted spaces.

医疗保健数据保护中的监管中断和套利。
本文解释了美国医疗保健数据保护的结构(特别是其部门和下游属性)如何导致不同类型的医疗保健数据长期不均衡的政策环境。它审查了医疗保健数据保护例外主义的主张和数据流动性等竞争需求。总之,本文的立场是,医疗数据例外主义仍然是一种有效的必要性,即使目前对数据流动性的担忧也可以在例外保护模型中得到适应。然而,重新调整我们对传统医疗保健领域之外的医疗保健数据的保护具有挑战性,目前甚至在政治上是不可能的。尽管如此,设想了一种混合模式,其中下游HIPAA模式仍然是医疗保健领域的主导力量,但补充有针对性的上游和使用点保护,适用于中断空间中的医疗保健数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信