Clinical application of limiting laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures utilizing inflating syringe intrinsic recoil.

Q2 Medicine
David M Corda, Christopher B Robards, Mark J Rice, Timothy E Morey, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Terrie Vasilopoulos, Sorin J Brull
{"title":"Clinical application of limiting laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures utilizing inflating syringe intrinsic recoil.","authors":"David M Corda, Christopher B Robards, Mark J Rice, Timothy E Morey, Nikolaus Gravenstein, Terrie Vasilopoulos, Sorin J Brull","doi":"10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.cuf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overinflation of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff may cause many of the complications associated with the use of the LMA. There is no clinically acceptable (cost effective and practical) method to ensure cuff pressure is maintained below the manufacturer's recommended maximum value of 60 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (44 mmHg). We studied the use of the intrinsic recoil of the LMA inflating syringe as an effective and practical way to limit cuff pressures at or below the manufacturer's recommended values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 332 patients into three separate groups: LMAs inserted and inflated per standard practice at the institution with only manual palpation of the pilot balloon; LMA cuff pressures measured by a pressure transducer and reduced to < 60 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (44 mmHg); and LMA intra-cuff pressure managed by the intrinsic recoil of the syringe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the pressure transducer group and the syringe recoil group for initial cuff pressure or cuff pressure 1 hour after surgery. Both the syringe recoil group and pressure transducer group were less likely than the standard practice group to have sore throat and dysphagia 1 hour after surgery. These differences remained 24 hours after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Syringe recoil provides an efficient and reproducible method similar to manometry in preventing overinflation of the LMA cuff and decreasing the incidence of postoperative laryngopharyngeal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21279,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","volume":"25 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931177/pdf/rjaic-25-1-11.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.cuf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Overinflation of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff may cause many of the complications associated with the use of the LMA. There is no clinically acceptable (cost effective and practical) method to ensure cuff pressure is maintained below the manufacturer's recommended maximum value of 60 cm H2O (44 mmHg). We studied the use of the intrinsic recoil of the LMA inflating syringe as an effective and practical way to limit cuff pressures at or below the manufacturer's recommended values.

Methods: We enrolled 332 patients into three separate groups: LMAs inserted and inflated per standard practice at the institution with only manual palpation of the pilot balloon; LMA cuff pressures measured by a pressure transducer and reduced to < 60 cm H2O (44 mmHg); and LMA intra-cuff pressure managed by the intrinsic recoil of the syringe.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the pressure transducer group and the syringe recoil group for initial cuff pressure or cuff pressure 1 hour after surgery. Both the syringe recoil group and pressure transducer group were less likely than the standard practice group to have sore throat and dysphagia 1 hour after surgery. These differences remained 24 hours after surgery.

Conclusions: Syringe recoil provides an efficient and reproducible method similar to manometry in preventing overinflation of the LMA cuff and decreasing the incidence of postoperative laryngopharyngeal complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用充气注射器内在反冲力限制喉罩气道充气罩囊压力的临床应用。
背景:喉罩通气道 (LMA) 充气罩囊过度充气可能导致与使用 LMA 相关的许多并发症。目前还没有临床上可接受的(具有成本效益且实用的)方法来确保充气罩囊压力保持在制造商推荐的最大值 60 cm H2O (44 mmHg) 以下。我们研究了使用 LMA 充气注射器的内在反冲力作为将充气罩囊压力限制在或低于制造商建议值的有效实用方法:我们将 332 名患者分为三组:方法: 我们将 332 名患者分为三组:按照本机构的标准做法插入 LMA 并为其充气,仅对先导球囊进行手动触诊;通过压力传感器测量 LMA 充气罩囊压力并将其降至 < 60 cm H2O(44 mmHg);通过注射器的内在反冲力控制 LMA 充气罩囊内压:就初始充气罩囊压力或术后 1 小时的充气罩囊压力而言,压力传感器组和注射器回卷组之间的差异无统计学意义。注射器后坐组和压力传感器组在术后 1 小时出现喉咙痛和吞咽困难的几率均低于标准操作组。这些差异在术后 24 小时后依然存在:在防止 LMA 充气罩囊过度充气和降低术后喉咽部并发症发生率方面,注射器反冲提供了一种类似于压力测量法的高效、可重复的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and has been published continuously since 1994. It is intended mainly for anaesthesia and intensive care providers, but it is also aimed at specialists in emergency medical care and in pain research and management. The Journal is indexed in Scopus, Embase, PubMed Central as well as the databases of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (CNCSIS) B+ category. The Journal publishes two issues per year, the first one in April and the second one in October, and contains original articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, book reviews and commentaries. The Journal is distributed free of charge to the members of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信