Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2018-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-12-29 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2016.27
Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman
{"title":"Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2016.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), <i>F</i>(1,59) = 4.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (<i>M</i> = 3.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.39) than control (<i>M</i> = 0.03, <i>SD</i> = 5.80; <i>t</i>(40) = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). SA alone (<i>M</i> = 1.97, <i>SD</i> = 9.30) was not more effective than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"13 1","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947967/pdf/nihms-845659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2016.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.

Aims: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.

Methods: Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.

Results: Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), F(1,59) = 4.43, p = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (M = 3.63, SD = 5.39) than control (M = 0.03, SD = 5.80; t(40) = 2.08, p = 0.04). SA alone (M = 1.97, SD = 9.30) was not more effective than control.

Conclusions: SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.

基于短信的吸烟干预使用信息自主权的有效性:试点研究。
简介:基于短信的干预措施具有巨大的干预潜力,而且随着信息技术的进步,这种干预措施的可行性也在不断提高:基于短信的干预措施具有巨大的干预潜力,而且随着信息技术的进步,其可行性也在不断提高。目的:本试验性随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较通过短信发送自我与专家撰写的戒烟内容的效果:62名年龄在25-66岁之间的参与者在30天的短信干预前后参加了实验室课程。参与者被随机分配到两种实验条件中的一种--仅自我撰写(SA)和带有实施意图的SA(SA+ii)--或积极对照组。参与者编写了 30-60 条简短的戒烟激励信息,在尝试戒烟时使用。SA+ii 参与者还被进一步指导如何预测障碍,并制定简单的 "如果-那么 "计划来克服这些障碍。实验组在干预阶段收到他们自己撰写的文本,而对照组参与者收到专家撰写的信息:总体而言,根据呼出一氧化碳(CO)的变化来衡量,吸烟率有所下降,F(1,59)= 4.43,P = 0.04。SA+ii组的一氧化碳减少量(M = 3.63,SD = 5.39)略高于对照组(M = 0.03,SD = 5.80;t(40) = 2.08,p = 0.04)。单用 SA(M = 1.97,SD = 9.30)并不比对照组更有效:SA似乎并不能提高疗效。然而,这项试验支持了之前的研究,表明基于文本的干预可以提高戒烟成功率,并可减少戒烟的心理症状。要确定提高干预效果的方法,还需要进行大量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信