Safety of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection for two large colorectal neoplasias in the same patient.

Min Seob Kwak, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung Wook Hwang, Jung Ho Bae, Jae Seung Soh, Seohyun Lee, Ho-Su Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang
{"title":"Safety of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection for two large colorectal neoplasias in the same patient.","authors":"Min Seob Kwak,&nbsp;Dong-Hoon Yang,&nbsp;Sung Wook Hwang,&nbsp;Jung Ho Bae,&nbsp;Jae Seung Soh,&nbsp;Seohyun Lee,&nbsp;Ho-Su Lee,&nbsp;Hyo Jeong Lee,&nbsp;Sang Hyoung Park,&nbsp;Byong Duk Ye,&nbsp;Jeong-Sik Byeon,&nbsp;Seung-Jae Myung,&nbsp;Suk-Kyun Yang","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2018.17409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Multiple large colorectal lesions requiring endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are sometimes diagnosed during colonoscopy. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of ESD of two colorectal lesions in one session.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The lesions of 16 patients who underwent two ESD procedures in a single session (double ESD group) from November 2009 to July 2014 were matched with those of 64 patients who underwent a single ESD procedure (single ESD group) based on the size and location of the lesion and presence of submucosal fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The net ESD time per patient was longer in double ESD group than in single ESD group (104.0±36.2 vs. 59.1±39.2 min, p<0.001). The net ESD time per lesion tended to be shorter in double ESD group than in single ESD group (49.6±30.0 vs. 59.1±39.2 min, p=0.077). The en bloc resection and curative resection rates did not differ between double ESD and single ESD groups (93.8 % vs. 98.4%, p=0.262; 90.6 % vs. 84.4 %, p=0.534, respectively). The intra- and postprocedural bleeding rates were 12.5% and 0% in double ESD group and 15.6% and 3.1% in single ESD group, respectively. Perforation occurred in two (6.3%) in double ESD group and in six (9.4%) in single ESD group (p=0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the single ESD, two simultaneous colorectal ESD procedures in a patient did not increase complications; the en bloc and curative resection rates were similar when performed a single ESD procedure and two simultaneous ESD procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":518528,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284699/pdf/tjg-29-2-183.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.17409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Multiple large colorectal lesions requiring endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are sometimes diagnosed during colonoscopy. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of ESD of two colorectal lesions in one session.

Materials and methods: The lesions of 16 patients who underwent two ESD procedures in a single session (double ESD group) from November 2009 to July 2014 were matched with those of 64 patients who underwent a single ESD procedure (single ESD group) based on the size and location of the lesion and presence of submucosal fibrosis.

Results: The net ESD time per patient was longer in double ESD group than in single ESD group (104.0±36.2 vs. 59.1±39.2 min, p<0.001). The net ESD time per lesion tended to be shorter in double ESD group than in single ESD group (49.6±30.0 vs. 59.1±39.2 min, p=0.077). The en bloc resection and curative resection rates did not differ between double ESD and single ESD groups (93.8 % vs. 98.4%, p=0.262; 90.6 % vs. 84.4 %, p=0.534, respectively). The intra- and postprocedural bleeding rates were 12.5% and 0% in double ESD group and 15.6% and 3.1% in single ESD group, respectively. Perforation occurred in two (6.3%) in double ESD group and in six (9.4%) in single ESD group (p=0.715).

Conclusion: Compared with the single ESD, two simultaneous colorectal ESD procedures in a patient did not increase complications; the en bloc and curative resection rates were similar when performed a single ESD procedure and two simultaneous ESD procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

同时内镜下粘膜下剥离术治疗同一患者两大结直肠肿瘤的安全性。
背景/目的:有时在结肠镜检查中诊断出需要内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)的多发大结直肠病变。我们在一次手术中评估了两个结直肠病变的ESD的可行性和安全性。材料与方法:将2009年11月至2014年7月16例单次接受两次ESD手术的患者(双ESD组)的病变与64例单次接受ESD手术的患者(单ESD组)的病变根据病变的大小、部位及有无粘膜下纤维化进行匹配。结果:双ESD组患者的净ESD时间比单ESD组长(104.0±36.2 vs 59.1±39.2 min)。结论:与单ESD组相比,患者同时进行两次结肠直肠ESD手术未增加并发症;单个ESD手术和两次同时进行ESD手术的整体切除率和治愈率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信