Bench to Bedside: The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program Focused on Biomedical Sciences and Action Research.

Houda A Darwiche, Marianne B Barnes, Lehman W Barnes, Lou Ann Cooper, Julie R Bokor, Mary Jo Koroly
{"title":"Bench to Bedside: The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program Focused on Biomedical Sciences and Action Research.","authors":"Houda A Darwiche, Marianne B Barnes, Lehman W Barnes, Lou Ann Cooper, Julie R Bokor, Mary Jo Koroly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A three-year, National Institutes of Health-funded residential project at a southeastern research university immersed 83 secondary science teachers in a summer institute called \"Bench to Bedside.\" Teachers were provided with knowledge, skills, experiences, and incentives to improve their science teaching and increase their awareness of scientific processes, technologies, and careers by examining the translational medicine continuum of basic to clinical research. This was done with the help of medical school researchers, clinical personnel, biotechnology entrepreneurs, program mentors, and prior year participants. A critical component of the institute was the preparation and implementation of an action research project that reflected teachers' newly acquired knowledge and skills. Action research proposals were critiqued by project team members and feedback provided prior to action research implementation in schools during the following year. Teachers shared their action research with colleagues and project team at a symposium and online as a critical step in networking the teachers. Results of a mixed methods program evaluation strategy indicate that the program produced significant gains in teachers' confidence to explain advanced biosciences topics, development of action research skills, and formation of a statewide biosciences network of key stakeholders. Constraints of time, variation in teacher content and action research background, technology availability, and school-related variables, among others, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":92287,"journal":{"name":"Science educator : the National Science Education Leadership Association journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"32-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930927/pdf/nihms871148.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science educator : the National Science Education Leadership Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A three-year, National Institutes of Health-funded residential project at a southeastern research university immersed 83 secondary science teachers in a summer institute called "Bench to Bedside." Teachers were provided with knowledge, skills, experiences, and incentives to improve their science teaching and increase their awareness of scientific processes, technologies, and careers by examining the translational medicine continuum of basic to clinical research. This was done with the help of medical school researchers, clinical personnel, biotechnology entrepreneurs, program mentors, and prior year participants. A critical component of the institute was the preparation and implementation of an action research project that reflected teachers' newly acquired knowledge and skills. Action research proposals were critiqued by project team members and feedback provided prior to action research implementation in schools during the following year. Teachers shared their action research with colleagues and project team at a symposium and online as a critical step in networking the teachers. Results of a mixed methods program evaluation strategy indicate that the program produced significant gains in teachers' confidence to explain advanced biosciences topics, development of action research skills, and formation of a statewide biosciences network of key stakeholders. Constraints of time, variation in teacher content and action research background, technology availability, and school-related variables, among others, are discussed.

Abstract Image

从工作台到床边:以生物医学科学和行动研究为重点的职业发展计划的有效性。
由美国国立卫生研究院资助,在美国东南部一所研究型大学开展了一个为期三年的寄宿项目,让 83 名中学科学教师参加了一个名为 "从工作台到床边 "的暑期学院。通过研究从基础研究到临床研究的转化医学连续体,为教师提供知识、技能、经验和激励措施,以改善他们的科学教学,提高他们对科学过程、技术和职业的认识。这项工作是在医学院研究人员、临床人员、生物技术企业家、项目导师和前一年参与者的帮助下完成的。该学院的一个重要组成部分是准备和实施一个行动研究项目,以反映教师新获得的知识和技能。在下一年学校实施行动研究之前,项目组成员会对行动研究提案进行点评,并提供反馈意见。教师们在研讨会上和网上与同事和项目小组分享他们的行动研究成果,这是建立教师网络的关键一步。混合方法计划评估策略的结果表明,该计划在教师解释高级生物科学课题的信心、行动研究技能的发展以及由主要利益相关者组成的全州生物科学网络的形成方面都取得了显著的成果。本文讨论了时间限制、教师教学内容和行动研究背景的差异、技术可用性以及学校相关变量等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信