Secondary use of electronic medical records for clinical research: Challenges and Opportunities.

Convergent science physical oncology Pub Date : 2018-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-12 DOI:10.1088/2057-1739/aaa905
Wen-Wai Yim, Amanda J Wheeler, Catherine Curtin, Todd H Wagner, Tina Hernandez-Boussard
{"title":"Secondary use of electronic medical records for clinical research: Challenges and Opportunities.","authors":"Wen-Wai Yim, Amanda J Wheeler, Catherine Curtin, Todd H Wagner, Tina Hernandez-Boussard","doi":"10.1088/2057-1739/aaa905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With increasingly ubiquitous electronic medical record (EMR) implementation accelerated by the adoption of the HITECH Act, there is much interest in the secondary use of collected data to improve outcomes and promote personalized medicine. A plethora of research has emerged using EMRs to investigate clinical research questions and assess variations in both treatments and outcomes. However, whether because of genuine complexities of modeling disease physiology or because of practical problems regarding data capture, data accuracy, and data completeness, the state of current EMR research is challenging and gives rise to concerns regarding study accuracy and reproducibility. This work explores challenges in how different experimental design decisions can influence results using a specific example of breast cancer patients undergoing excision and reconstruction surgeries from EMRs in an academic hospital and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) We discuss emerging strategies that will mitigate these limitations, including data sharing, application of natural language processing, and improved EMR user design.</p>","PeriodicalId":91466,"journal":{"name":"Convergent science physical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/2057-1739/aaa905","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergent science physical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1739/aaa905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

With increasingly ubiquitous electronic medical record (EMR) implementation accelerated by the adoption of the HITECH Act, there is much interest in the secondary use of collected data to improve outcomes and promote personalized medicine. A plethora of research has emerged using EMRs to investigate clinical research questions and assess variations in both treatments and outcomes. However, whether because of genuine complexities of modeling disease physiology or because of practical problems regarding data capture, data accuracy, and data completeness, the state of current EMR research is challenging and gives rise to concerns regarding study accuracy and reproducibility. This work explores challenges in how different experimental design decisions can influence results using a specific example of breast cancer patients undergoing excision and reconstruction surgeries from EMRs in an academic hospital and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) We discuss emerging strategies that will mitigate these limitations, including data sharing, application of natural language processing, and improved EMR user design.

电子病历在临床研究中的二次使用:挑战与机遇。
随着越来越普遍的电子病历(EMR)的实施加速了HITECH法案的通过,人们对二次使用收集的数据来改善结果和促进个性化医疗很感兴趣。大量的研究已经出现,使用电子病历来调查临床研究问题并评估治疗和结果的变化。然而,无论是由于疾病生理学建模的真正复杂性,还是由于数据捕获、数据准确性和数据完整性方面的实际问题,当前EMR研究的状态具有挑战性,并引起了对研究准确性和可重复性的担忧。本研究以一家学术医院和退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的EMR为例,探讨了不同实验设计决策如何影响结果的挑战。我们讨论了减轻这些限制的新兴策略,包括数据共享、自然语言处理的应用和改进的EMR用户设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信