Confidence in the safety of standard childhood vaccinations among New Zealand health professionals.

The New Zealand medical journal Pub Date : 2018-05-04
Carol Lee, Isabelle Duck, Chris G Sibley
{"title":"Confidence in the safety of standard childhood vaccinations among New Zealand health professionals.","authors":"Carol Lee,&nbsp;Isabelle Duck,&nbsp;Chris G Sibley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the level of confidence in the safety of standard childhood vaccinations among health professionals in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from the 2013/14 New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS) was used to investigate the level of agreement that \"it is safe to vaccinate children following the standard New Zealand immunisation schedule\" among different classes of health professionals (N=1,032).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most health professionals showed higher levels of vaccine confidence, with 96.7% of those describing their occupation as GP or simply 'doctor' (GPs/doctor) and 90.7% of pharmacists expressing strong vaccine confidence. However, there were important disparities between some other classes of health professionals, with only 65.1% of midwives and 13.6% of practitioners of alternative medicine expressing high vaccine confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As health professionals are a highly trusted source of vaccine information, communicating the consensus of belief among GPs/doctors that vaccines are safe may help provide reassurance for parents who ask about vaccine safety. However, the lower level of vaccine confidence among midwives is a matter of concern that may have negative influence on parental perceptions of vaccinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":160836,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the level of confidence in the safety of standard childhood vaccinations among health professionals in New Zealand.

Method: Data from the 2013/14 New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS) was used to investigate the level of agreement that "it is safe to vaccinate children following the standard New Zealand immunisation schedule" among different classes of health professionals (N=1,032).

Results: Most health professionals showed higher levels of vaccine confidence, with 96.7% of those describing their occupation as GP or simply 'doctor' (GPs/doctor) and 90.7% of pharmacists expressing strong vaccine confidence. However, there were important disparities between some other classes of health professionals, with only 65.1% of midwives and 13.6% of practitioners of alternative medicine expressing high vaccine confidence.

Conclusion: As health professionals are a highly trusted source of vaccine information, communicating the consensus of belief among GPs/doctors that vaccines are safe may help provide reassurance for parents who ask about vaccine safety. However, the lower level of vaccine confidence among midwives is a matter of concern that may have negative influence on parental perceptions of vaccinations.

新西兰卫生专业人员对标准儿童疫苗接种安全性的信心。
目的:调查新西兰卫生专业人员对标准儿童疫苗接种安全性的信心水平。方法:采用2013/14年新西兰态度和价值观研究(NZAVS)的数据,调查不同类别的卫生专业人员(N=1,032)对“按照新西兰标准免疫计划为儿童接种疫苗是安全的”的认同程度。结果:大多数卫生专业人员表现出较高的疫苗信心水平,96.7%的人将其职业描述为全科医生或简单的“医生”(GP /doctor), 90.7%的药剂师对疫苗表示强烈的信心。然而,其他一些类别的卫生专业人员之间存在重大差异,只有65.1%的助产士和13.6%的替代医学从业人员对疫苗表示高度信任。结论:由于卫生专业人员是高度可信的疫苗信息来源,在全科医生/医生中传播疫苗安全的共识可能有助于为询问疫苗安全性的父母提供保证。然而,助产士对疫苗的信心水平较低是一个令人担忧的问题,可能会对父母对疫苗接种的看法产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书