Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression.

Yanyan Wei, Junjuan Zhu, Shengke Pan, Hui Su, Hui Li, Jijun Wang
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression.","authors":"Yanyan Wei,&nbsp;Junjuan Zhu,&nbsp;Shengke Pan,&nbsp;Hui Su,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Jijun Wang","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new type of physiotherapy technology that has been widely used in the research of depression. Although many clinical trials have found that compared to the placebo interventions, rTMS has a significant effect on the improvement of depressive symptoms, the outcomes remain inconsistent due to differences in rTMS treatment frequency, parameter settings, and site for stimulation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of rTMS combined with antidepressants for the treatment of depression in Chinese and English randomized, double-blind and sham controlled trials and explored the possible related factors affecting the efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used keywords \"depression\" and \"transcranial magnetic Stimulaton\" as filters to search for the Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of rTMS treatments for depression both in Chinese electronic databases: Wan fang, Wellpresi, and China Knowledge Network and in English electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library (total 8 databases) up to January 5, 2017; assessed the quality of the included studies with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool; and according to the trial groups performed statistical analysis of the efficacy and safety presented in the included studies with RevMan5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9798 articles were retrieved, and finally, 29 studies were included in this study, with a total sample size of 1659, in which the sample size of the study groups was 838, and the control group sample size was 821. After Meta-analysis, we found that treatment combined rTMS with antidepressants improves depressive symptoms in patients with depression (SDM=-0.84, 95%CI=-1.19 <sup>~</sup> -0.48). Based on the Cochrane risk bias Assessment tool, an assessment of the bias of the included studies was conducted, one of which was assessed as having a \"high risk of bias\" and others as \"impossible to judge\". None of the included studies reported significant adverse events, and Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in dropout rate between the two groups (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75<sup>~</sup>2.12, Z=0.89, <i>p</i>=0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>treatment that combined rTMS with antidepressant medication for depressive symptoms has a certain therapeutic advantage versus the placebo controls, demonstrated slight side effects, and attained good acceptability, but the differences between trials remained relatively large. Clinical trials with large sample sizes are required for further exploration of the possible related factors affecting the efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"29 6","pages":"328-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/33/sap-29-328.PMC5925584.pdf","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new type of physiotherapy technology that has been widely used in the research of depression. Although many clinical trials have found that compared to the placebo interventions, rTMS has a significant effect on the improvement of depressive symptoms, the outcomes remain inconsistent due to differences in rTMS treatment frequency, parameter settings, and site for stimulation.

Aims: This study systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of rTMS combined with antidepressants for the treatment of depression in Chinese and English randomized, double-blind and sham controlled trials and explored the possible related factors affecting the efficacy and safety.

Methods: We used keywords "depression" and "transcranial magnetic Stimulaton" as filters to search for the Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of rTMS treatments for depression both in Chinese electronic databases: Wan fang, Wellpresi, and China Knowledge Network and in English electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library (total 8 databases) up to January 5, 2017; assessed the quality of the included studies with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool; and according to the trial groups performed statistical analysis of the efficacy and safety presented in the included studies with RevMan5.3 software.

Results: A total of 9798 articles were retrieved, and finally, 29 studies were included in this study, with a total sample size of 1659, in which the sample size of the study groups was 838, and the control group sample size was 821. After Meta-analysis, we found that treatment combined rTMS with antidepressants improves depressive symptoms in patients with depression (SDM=-0.84, 95%CI=-1.19 ~ -0.48). Based on the Cochrane risk bias Assessment tool, an assessment of the bias of the included studies was conducted, one of which was assessed as having a "high risk of bias" and others as "impossible to judge". None of the included studies reported significant adverse events, and Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in dropout rate between the two groups (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75~2.12, Z=0.89, p=0.37).

Conclusion: treatment that combined rTMS with antidepressant medication for depressive symptoms has a certain therapeutic advantage versus the placebo controls, demonstrated slight side effects, and attained good acceptability, but the differences between trials remained relatively large. Clinical trials with large sample sizes are required for further exploration of the possible related factors affecting the efficacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症疗效和安全性的meta分析。
背景:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种新型的物理治疗技术,已广泛应用于抑郁症的研究。尽管许多临床试验发现,与安慰剂干预相比,rTMS对抑郁症状的改善有显著影响,但由于rTMS治疗频率、参数设置和刺激部位的差异,结果仍然不一致。目的:本研究通过中英文随机、双盲和假对照试验,系统评价rTMS联合抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症的安全性和有效性,探讨可能影响疗效和安全性的相关因素。方法:以关键词“抑郁症”和“经颅磁刺激”为筛选词,检索截至2017年1月5日的中文电子数据库万方、韦尔presi、中国知识网和英文电子数据库PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library(共8个数据库)中rTMS治疗抑郁症的临床随机对照试验(RCTs);用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的质量;并根据试验组使用RevMan5.3软件对纳入研究的疗效和安全性进行统计分析。结果:共检索到9798篇文献,最终纳入29项研究,总样本量1659例,其中研究组样本量838例,对照组样本量821例。meta分析后,我们发现rTMS联合抗抑郁药物治疗可改善抑郁症患者的抑郁症状(SDM=-0.84, 95%CI=-1.19 ~ -0.48)。基于Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具,对纳入的研究进行偏倚评估,其中一项研究被评估为“高偏倚风险”,其他研究被评估为“无法判断”。纳入的研究均未报告显著不良事件,meta分析显示两组患者的辍学率无统计学差异(RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75~2.12, Z=0.89, p=0.37)。结论:与安慰剂对照相比,rTMS联合抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症状具有一定的治疗优势,副作用轻微,可接受性较好,但试验间差异较大。需要进行大样本量的临床试验,进一步探索可能影响疗效的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍: Shanghai archives of psychiatry (bimonthly) was founded in 1959 and is sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center. The journal is aimed at mental health workers across the country, including psychiatrists and nurses, clinical psychologists, social workers, and people who are committed to the cause of mental health. It focuses on reporting clinical research results and practical experience in the field of psychiatry, and introduces the latest knowledge in psychiatry and related fields. The columns include monographs, case reports, clinical case discussions, reviews, mental health and law, and debates and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信