Responses to fertility treatment among patients with cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2018-04-17 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-018-0048-2
A V Dolinko, L V Farland, S A Missmer, S S Srouji, C Racowsky, E S Ginsburg
{"title":"Responses to fertility treatment among patients with cancer: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"A V Dolinko, L V Farland, S A Missmer, S S Srouji, C Racowsky, E S Ginsburg","doi":"10.1186/s40738-018-0048-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer treatments have significant negative impacts on female fertility, but the impact of cancer itself on fertility remains to be clarified. While some studies have shown that compared with healthy women, those with cancer require higher doses of gonadotropins resulting in decreased oocyte yields, others have shown comparable oocyte yields between the two groups. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is an association between any cancer and/or type of cancer, and response to ovarian stimulation for egg and embryo banking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, ovarian stimulation cycles performed from June 2007 through October 2014 at a single academic medical center were reviewed to identify those undertaken for women with cancer undergoing fertility preservation (<i>n</i> = 147) or women with no cancer undergoing their first cycle due to male factor infertility (<i>n</i> = 664). Of the 147 women undergoing fertility preservation, 105 had local cancer (Stage I-III solid malignancies) and 42 had systemic cancer (hematologic or Stage IV solid malignancies). Response to ovarian stimulation was compared among these two groups and women with no cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusting for age and BMI, women with systemic cancer had lower baseline antral follicle counts (AFC) than women with no cancer or local cancer. Women with systemic cancer required higher doses of FSH than women with no cancer or local cancer, and they had higher oocyte to AFC ratios than women with no cancer or local cancer, but greater odds of cycle cancellation as compared to women with no cancer or local cancer. No significant differences were observed among the three groups for duration of stimulation, number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, or number of embryos created.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with cancer achieve similar oocyte and embryo yields as women with no cancer, although those with systemic cancer require higher FSH doses and are at greater risk of cycle cancellation.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-018-0048-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer treatments have significant negative impacts on female fertility, but the impact of cancer itself on fertility remains to be clarified. While some studies have shown that compared with healthy women, those with cancer require higher doses of gonadotropins resulting in decreased oocyte yields, others have shown comparable oocyte yields between the two groups. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is an association between any cancer and/or type of cancer, and response to ovarian stimulation for egg and embryo banking.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, ovarian stimulation cycles performed from June 2007 through October 2014 at a single academic medical center were reviewed to identify those undertaken for women with cancer undergoing fertility preservation (n = 147) or women with no cancer undergoing their first cycle due to male factor infertility (n = 664). Of the 147 women undergoing fertility preservation, 105 had local cancer (Stage I-III solid malignancies) and 42 had systemic cancer (hematologic or Stage IV solid malignancies). Response to ovarian stimulation was compared among these two groups and women with no cancer.

Results: Adjusting for age and BMI, women with systemic cancer had lower baseline antral follicle counts (AFC) than women with no cancer or local cancer. Women with systemic cancer required higher doses of FSH than women with no cancer or local cancer, and they had higher oocyte to AFC ratios than women with no cancer or local cancer, but greater odds of cycle cancellation as compared to women with no cancer or local cancer. No significant differences were observed among the three groups for duration of stimulation, number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved, or number of embryos created.

Conclusions: Women with cancer achieve similar oocyte and embryo yields as women with no cancer, although those with systemic cancer require higher FSH doses and are at greater risk of cycle cancellation.

Abstract Image

癌症患者对生育治疗的反应:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:癌症治疗对女性的生育能力有很大的负面影响,但癌症本身对生育能力的影响仍有待明确。一些研究表明,与健康女性相比,癌症患者需要更高的促性腺激素剂量,从而导致卵母细胞产量下降,而另一些研究则表明,两组女性的卵母细胞产量相当。本研究旨在评估任何癌症和/或癌症类型与卵子和胚胎库卵巢刺激反应之间是否存在关联:在这项回顾性队列研究中,研究人员回顾了 2007 年 6 月至 2014 年 10 月在一家学术医疗中心进行的卵巢刺激周期,以确定哪些周期是为接受生育力保存的癌症女性(n = 147)或因男性因素不孕而接受首个周期的非癌症女性(n = 664)进行的。在接受生育力保存的 147 名女性中,105 人患有局部癌症(I-III 期实体恶性肿瘤),42 人患有全身性癌症(血液学或 IV 期实体恶性肿瘤)。对这两组妇女和未患癌症妇女的卵巢刺激反应进行了比较:调整年龄和体重指数后,患全身性癌症的妇女的基线前卵泡计数(AFC)低于未患癌症或患局部癌症的妇女。与未患癌症或患局部癌症的妇女相比,患全身性癌症的妇女所需的FSH剂量更高,她们的卵母细胞与AFC比率更高,但与未患癌症或患局部癌症的妇女相比,她们的周期取消几率更大。在刺激持续时间、取回的卵母细胞和成熟卵母细胞数量以及胚胎数量方面,三组之间没有观察到明显差异:结论:患癌症的妇女获得的卵母细胞和胚胎数量与未患癌症的妇女相似,但患全身性癌症的妇女需要更高的 FSH 剂量,且周期取消的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信