Reliability and Construct Validity of the SENS Motion® Activity Measurement System as a Tool to Detect Sedentary Behaviour in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Arthritis Pub Date : 2018-03-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/6596278
Cecilie Bartholdy, Henrik Gudbergsen, Henning Bliddal, Morten Kjærgaard, Kasper Lundberg Lykkegaard, Marius Henriksen
{"title":"Reliability and Construct Validity of the SENS Motion® Activity Measurement System as a Tool to Detect Sedentary Behaviour in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Cecilie Bartholdy,&nbsp;Henrik Gudbergsen,&nbsp;Henning Bliddal,&nbsp;Morten Kjærgaard,&nbsp;Kasper Lundberg Lykkegaard,&nbsp;Marius Henriksen","doi":"10.1155/2018/6596278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical inactivity is important to address, and an objective way of measuring inactivity is by accelerometry. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and construct validity of the SENS motion system to record physical activity and inactivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants with an age > 40 years and an average weekly pain above 0 on a numeric rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) were included. Participants had a total of two study visits and at each visit participants completed a standardized activity. Data from 24 participants were analysed. A mean agreement of 99% (SD 3%) for sedentary behaviour and a mean agreement of 97% (SD 9%) for active behaviour were found. The agreement for \"walking\" was 28% (SD 18%). Mean agreement between recordings on the two visits was 96% (SD 8%) for sedentary behaviour and 99% (SD 1%) for active behaviour. The SENS motion activity measurement system can be regarded as a reliable and valid device for measuring sedentary behaviour in patients with knee OA, whereas detection of walking is not reliable and would require further work.</p>","PeriodicalId":89323,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis","volume":"2018 ","pages":"6596278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/6596278","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6596278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Physical inactivity is important to address, and an objective way of measuring inactivity is by accelerometry. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and construct validity of the SENS motion system to record physical activity and inactivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants with an age > 40 years and an average weekly pain above 0 on a numeric rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) were included. Participants had a total of two study visits and at each visit participants completed a standardized activity. Data from 24 participants were analysed. A mean agreement of 99% (SD 3%) for sedentary behaviour and a mean agreement of 97% (SD 9%) for active behaviour were found. The agreement for "walking" was 28% (SD 18%). Mean agreement between recordings on the two visits was 96% (SD 8%) for sedentary behaviour and 99% (SD 1%) for active behaviour. The SENS motion activity measurement system can be regarded as a reliable and valid device for measuring sedentary behaviour in patients with knee OA, whereas detection of walking is not reliable and would require further work.

SENS Motion®活动测量系统作为检测膝骨关节炎患者久坐行为的工具的可靠性和结构效度。
缺乏运动是需要解决的重要问题,而测量缺乏运动的客观方法是使用加速度计。本研究的目的是确定SENS运动系统记录膝关节骨关节炎患者运动和不运动的可靠性和构建有效性。参与者年龄> 40岁,每周平均疼痛在数值评定量表上高于0(0 =无疼痛,10 =最严重的疼痛)。参与者共进行了两次研究访问,每次访问参与者都完成了一项标准化活动。研究人员分析了24名参与者的数据。久坐行为的平均一致性为99%(标准差为3%),运动行为的平均一致性为97%(标准差为9%)。同意“步行”的比例为28% (SD为18%)。两次访问记录中,久坐行为的平均一致性为96% (SD为8%),活动行为的平均一致性为99% (SD为1%)。SENS运动活动测量系统可以被认为是测量膝关节OA患者久坐行为的可靠和有效的设备,而对步行的检测则不可靠,需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信