Reflections on integrated care from those working in and leading integrated respiratory teams.

London journal of primary care Pub Date : 2018-01-01 eCollection Date: 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1080/17571472.2017.1421020
Nicola J Roberts, Mike Ward, Irem Patel, Janelle Yorke, Martyn R Partridge
{"title":"Reflections on integrated care from those working in and leading integrated respiratory teams.","authors":"Nicola J Roberts,&nbsp;Mike Ward,&nbsp;Irem Patel,&nbsp;Janelle Yorke,&nbsp;Martyn R Partridge","doi":"10.1080/17571472.2017.1421020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of integrated care has been advocated for many years to address some of the challenges faced by the NHS. This report examines the experiences of respiratory healthcare specialists working in an integrated role. Twelve qualitative telephone interviews were undertaken with a range of integrated respiratory specialists and their teams working in both hospitals and the community. A descriptive and thematic approach to data analysis was adopted. Participants were very enthusiastic about their roles and saw themselves as ambassadors for this new way of working. Several key themes were identified from the analysis which participants identified as barriers or enablers to the successful undertaking of an integrated respiratory specialist role. These included the participants' previous work experience and background, the range of multi-disciplinary expertise within or needed for the team, the structure of the team leadership and the measurement of outcomes to evaluate the team. Participants identified the need for clear job descriptions and roles, shared training and standards and appropriate outcome evaluation. More research is needed to understand how these new ways of working are developing and how they can be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":89823,"journal":{"name":"London journal of primary care","volume":"10 2","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17571472.2017.1421020","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London journal of primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1421020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The concept of integrated care has been advocated for many years to address some of the challenges faced by the NHS. This report examines the experiences of respiratory healthcare specialists working in an integrated role. Twelve qualitative telephone interviews were undertaken with a range of integrated respiratory specialists and their teams working in both hospitals and the community. A descriptive and thematic approach to data analysis was adopted. Participants were very enthusiastic about their roles and saw themselves as ambassadors for this new way of working. Several key themes were identified from the analysis which participants identified as barriers or enablers to the successful undertaking of an integrated respiratory specialist role. These included the participants' previous work experience and background, the range of multi-disciplinary expertise within or needed for the team, the structure of the team leadership and the measurement of outcomes to evaluate the team. Participants identified the need for clear job descriptions and roles, shared training and standards and appropriate outcome evaluation. More research is needed to understand how these new ways of working are developing and how they can be evaluated.

在呼吸综合小组工作和领导的人员对综合护理的思考。
多年来,人们一直提倡综合护理的概念,以应对NHS面临的一些挑战。本报告考察了呼吸保健专家在综合工作中的经验。对在医院和社区工作的一系列综合呼吸系统专家及其团队进行了12次定性电话采访。采用了描述性和专题性的数据分析方法。参与者对自己的角色非常热情,并将自己视为这种新工作方式的大使。分析中确定了几个关键主题,参与者认为这些主题是成功发挥综合呼吸专家作用的障碍或推动者。其中包括参与者以前的工作经验和背景、团队内部或所需的多学科专业知识范围、团队领导层的结构以及评估团队的结果测量。与会者指出,需要明确的工作说明和作用、共享培训和标准以及适当的成果评估。需要更多的研究来了解这些新的工作方式是如何发展的,以及如何对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书